The OFFICIAL Unofficial Achewood Message Board

Trivial Pursuits => People & Places => Topic started by: Carlos del Vaca on March 22, 2005, 05:43:22 pm

Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Carlos del Vaca on March 22, 2005, 05:43:22 pm
Because there aren't enough people on this board popping out babies, my wife and I are having another one.  A girl, due August 6.

Of COURSE it's a girl.  We had a boy's name picked out, but we can't decide on a girl's name.  Mrs. del Vaca named the first one, so I think I should get to name the second one, but she vetoes everything I throw out there.

It's extremely weird to look at our almost-two-year-old and say, "You're our oldest."
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: side_show on March 22, 2005, 05:50:04 pm
Congrats!

For names, you need to start by suggesting some really, really bad names to get the ball rolling:  Eunice, Tanzania, etc, then slip only one reasonable one that you like into the list, and it sounds oh so much better.  True story - if I was a boy, my name was going to be Nathan.  My mom told me that just a little while ago.  And I was definitly, definitly supposed to be a boy.  This was made very clear to me early on in life.
Title: Re: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: CortJstr on March 22, 2005, 05:55:53 pm
Quote from: "carlosdelvaca"
Because there aren't enough people on this board popping out babies, my wife and I are having another one.  A girl, due August 6.

Of COURSE it's a girl.  We had a boy's name picked out, but we can't decide on a girl's name.  Mrs. del Vaca named the first one, so I think I should get to name the second one, but she vetoes everything I throw out there.

It's extremely weird to look at our almost-two-year-old and say, "You're our oldest."

My mom was the 3rd girl and was supposed to be a boy. They just feminized her name from Anthony Donald.

But I agree that you should start with crap names. Trinity. Candy. Cyndi. Actually, just peruse jadedvideo and write down any name you see. Those should all get vetoed.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: AugustWest on March 22, 2005, 06:09:35 pm
Congrats!
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: AlohaDawg on March 22, 2005, 06:11:45 pm
Good going, Carlos!
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: pmcd9 on March 22, 2005, 06:21:49 pm
[Insert random congratulatory statement here]

It's another heir for the mayor.

~Paul
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Nabubrush on March 22, 2005, 06:28:21 pm
Happy child, Carlos!
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: jough on March 22, 2005, 06:38:06 pm
Hey, congrats!

As far as names, I would like to name my first daughter "Helvetica" but there are other acceptible pretty names for girls, like "Ariel," "Verdana," and "Lucida."
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Bozack on March 22, 2005, 07:11:54 pm
Congrats, man!
I want my firstborn to have the middle name "Strange." Because then, if they ever get super powers, they can just drop the last name and have their kickass superhero name.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: slink on March 22, 2005, 07:13:20 pm
Heartiest of congrats and that.

I'd come up with some names, but well, from someone called Slink it's probably going to be shot down straight off. That said, I always considered calling a kid Serena. But I'm not so sure anymore. Plus I am so far from the thought of actually having kids...
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: AugustWest on March 22, 2005, 07:31:37 pm
Quote from: "Bozack"
Congrats, man!
I want my firstborn to have the middle name "Strange." Because then, if they ever get super powers, they can just drop the last name and have their kickass superhero name.


Or if they ever get a Ph.D. (or M.D., D.D., J.D. or whatever), they can be Dr. Strange!
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: CortJstr on March 22, 2005, 07:59:18 pm
Quote from: "AugustWest"
Quote from: "Bozack"
Congrats, man!
I want my firstborn to have the middle name "Strange." Because then, if they ever get super powers, they can just drop the last name and have their kickass superhero name.

Or if they ever get a Ph.D. (or M.D., D.D., J.D. or whatever), they can be Dr. Strange!

He gave my mom her braces.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: AugustWest on March 22, 2005, 08:35:42 pm
Quote from: "Asherdan"
Congrats!

I expect you will soon have headphones to abdomen in order to start the 'hoadie' training.

hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie


Aw man!  I thought I was finally free of the hoadie.

hoadie.

hoadie.

hoadie.

hoadie.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Carlos del Vaca on March 22, 2005, 09:47:27 pm
This year my fantasy baseball team is the Virginia Hoadies.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Bozack on March 22, 2005, 10:28:53 pm
Christ. Now I'm singing,
Hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie
MUSHROOM MUSHROOM!
Hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie
MUSHROOM MUSHROOM!
Hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie hoadie
SNAKKKKEE SNAKKKKE SNAKKKEEE
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: wombat on March 23, 2005, 01:39:21 am
Quote from: "jough"

As far as names, I would like to name my first daughter "Helvetica" but there are other acceptible pretty names for girls, like "Ariel," "Verdana," and "Lucida."


I like the idea of naming a baby Ariel, with everyone thinking it's some normal name but that's not what you meant by it.

Now I have a strange urge to get another cat and name it Times New Roman.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: jough on March 23, 2005, 01:53:24 am
If I got a dog I'd name it "Cooper".
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Beatrice on March 23, 2005, 02:25:23 am
you are a fertile people!
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Choop on March 23, 2005, 03:06:18 am
"Andale." Call him Andy. Only you will know.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Skillator on March 23, 2005, 04:28:20 am
If I have a boy I'm totally naming him Ben Guiat

http://www.1001fonts.com/payfonts/286/Benguiat-Frisky-Bold.html
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: pmcd9 on March 23, 2005, 04:35:25 am
If I ever have a baby girl i'm totally going to name her after my great grandmother Amazon Caledonia.

Seriously.

~Paul
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: miles on March 23, 2005, 04:49:36 am
Quote from: "Beatrice"
you are a fertile people!


Really!  What are the odds?  Scary thing is my lady is talking about baby names and what sex she'd like to have first.  But I'm holding out till I'm 30.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: arkabee on March 23, 2005, 02:29:49 pm
Quote from: "miles"

Really!  What are the odds?  Scary thing is my lady is talking about baby names and what sex she'd like to have first.  But I'm holding out till I'm 30.


dude, that's a long time to wait to have sex.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: pmcd9 on March 23, 2005, 04:17:29 pm
Quote from: "miles"
My lady is talking about...what sex she'd like to have

More power to her.

~Paul
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Nabubrush on March 23, 2005, 04:36:53 pm
Quote from: "pmcd9"
Quote from: "miles"
My lady is talking about...what sex she'd like to have

More power to her.

~Paul


At least she's down with there being lots of different kinds - some people have the one default and never really . . . stretch.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: miles on March 23, 2005, 05:50:14 pm
Quote from: "arkabee"
Quote from: "miles"

Really!  What are the odds?  Scary thing is my lady is talking about baby names and what sex she'd like to have first.  But I'm holding out till I'm 30.


dude, that's a long time to wait to have sex.


You're telling me.  Actually, I'm waiting till my wedding night.  That way, it'll be between me, her and God, and will be that much better.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: wombat on March 23, 2005, 06:54:08 pm
Quote from: "miles"


You're telling me.  Actually, I'm waiting till my wedding night.  That way, it'll be between me, her and God, and will be that much better.


Oh dear, that is a very disturbing threesome to imagine.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: AugustWest on March 23, 2005, 07:08:34 pm
Quote from: "wombat"
Quote from: "miles"


You're telling me.  Actually, I'm waiting till my wedding night.  That way, it'll be between me, her and God, and will be that much better.


Oh dear, that is a very disturbing threesome to imagine.


That reminds me of this (http://cheston.com/pbf/PBF066BCEden.html).
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: pmcd9 on March 23, 2005, 07:34:30 pm
Quote from: "wombat"
Oh dear, that is a very disturbing threesome to imagine.


I resisted the temptation to make that joke.  From a man's perspective, I doubt it's a good idea to get into a 3 way with God.  You're not gonna fare very well by comparison.

~pAUL
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: jough on March 23, 2005, 10:39:36 pm
Yeah, man, God has the biggest cock of all.  

Anyway, saving yourself for marriage was a population control concept.  That, and before we had SCIENCE people believed that you only had so many orgasms and then that was it - so you had to "save them" for marriage.

Now we know that is bullshit and while it is true that a woman only has so many eggs with which to create more humans they're going to be fertile for a couple days a month no matter what.

So you may as well get your groove on.  Not every two people are compatible sexually and it's better to find out before you're married that the only way your wife can get off is to have a Mexican juggling team fuck her in every hole she's got.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: miles on March 23, 2005, 10:53:04 pm
Quote from: "jough"
So you may as well get your groove on.  Not every two people are compatible sexually and it's better to find out before you're married that the only way your wife can get off is to have a Mexican juggling team fuck her in every hole she's got.


Oh, I was only kidding.  We've already taken each other for several test drives, and appear to be very compatible.  What I meant to say is that she is already talking about whether she'd like to have a boy or girl first.  Not that you get to choose...but apparently it's fun to talk about.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: CortJstr on March 23, 2005, 10:55:31 pm
Quote from: "jough"
the only way your wife can get off is to have a Mexican juggling team fuck her in every hole she's got.

That's just sick! You disgusting bastard.
Unless the jugglers are wearing luchador masks. Then it's cool.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Bozack on March 24, 2005, 12:59:29 am
Quote from: "jough"
...it's better to find out before you're married that the only way your wife can get off is to have a Mexican juggling team fuck her in every hole she's got.


My god.....the luchadors....they're made of stars!
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Beatrice on March 24, 2005, 05:59:36 pm
Bozack, remember that horrible movie with the amateur wrestlers and the UHaul full of zombies you made me watch?  I know, i know, it's awesome on paper, but not when porn stars are playing superhero.  Anyways, luchadors, yeah.  I'd rather get with a zombie.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: jough on March 24, 2005, 06:01:28 pm
Zombie porn?

Bozack, you've been holding out on us.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Bozack on March 24, 2005, 07:09:30 pm
Jesus, that movie sucked SO BAD. They weren't REAL luchadors, they were a bunch of asshole college students pretending to be luchadors. And there were all of these girls who were obviously supposed to be the sex interests, but they.....erghh. Were not.
I know it sounds like it would be hard to make a boring movie about luchadors, zombies, and scantily clad college students, but believe me, America is the home of innovation. We did it.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Pedro Picasso on March 24, 2005, 07:45:05 pm
Congratulations, Carlos!  Hurray!

Quote from: "jough"
Anyway, saving yourself for marriage was a population control concept.  That, and before we had SCIENCE people believed that you only had so many orgasms and then that was it - so you had to "save them" for marriage.

Now we know that is bullshit and while it is true that a woman only has so many eggs with which to create more humans they're going to be fertile for a couple days a month no matter what.


In defense of chastity, saving yourself for marriage is a helpful and useful concept even today!  Sexual intercourse is often treated lightly and has been for pretty much ever, but it is a big deal.  The emotional, psychological, and spiritual bonds it fosters are incredibly painful when broken.  That's why we have social constructs that aren't supposed to be broken at all.

As for casual sex, it may not lead to long term bonding, but over time it seems spiritually harmful.  Or psychologically if you prefer.  Kind of deadening.  

I've been unable to do personal research in this area, but these are my conclusions based on observation.  Lifelong marriage is the proper context for sex.  Outside of that, it just seems to mess things up.

JL and I were virgins on our wedding night, and it's really worked out for us.  Besides, if you're going to marry somebody and you're worried about what sex with them will be like, maybe you should reevaluate how much you know about the person and the level of attraction involved.

This message brought to you by the preachy prudes at Keep-It-In-Your-#####.org
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: AlohaDawg on March 24, 2005, 10:12:35 pm
Can't agree with that. But my hoss got out of the barn a long, long time ago. A lot of times.

Sex does not lead to psychological problems all by itself. I'd say more married people go nuts from marriage then sexually active people go nuts from fuckin'. The pathology comes first, then the acting out behaviors follow. Usually. It's about how you handle yourself and your situation.

If a person has a problem with a substance or behavior, they should be pointed toward help. If a person can handle a (legal or acceptable) substance or behavior, then they should be allowed to do it. It's that easy.

If you're religious beliefs call for chastity to marriage, that is something else. That's between people and God.

In terms of the 'secular' efforts toward abstention as a means of preventing pregnancy and STDs, studies seem to indicate that very often virginity contracts lead to experimentation in more risky forms of sex in order to avoid standard genito-penetrative sex. So what's worse?
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: pmcd9 on March 24, 2005, 10:23:41 pm
Quote from: "AlohaDawg"
In terms of the 'secular' efforts toward abstention as a means of preventing pregnancy and STDs, studies seem to indicate that very often virginity contracts lead to experimentation in more risky forms of sex in order to avoid standard genito-penetrative sex. So what's worse?


Our abstinance until marriage society has bred a generation of blowjob queens.  It's a great time to be a teenager.

~Paul
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: CortJstr on March 24, 2005, 10:42:04 pm
Quote from: "AlohaDawg"
In terms of the 'secular' efforts toward abstention as a means of preventing pregnancy and STDs, studies seem to indicate that very often virginity contracts lead to experimentation in more risky forms of sex in order to avoid standard genito-penetrative sex. So what's worse?

I saw that story in the Post. Teens who sign the "virginity pacts" are more likely to do oral and anal. At work we busted a gut when we read that. Oral I can kind of see, but anal? That's just funny.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: AlohaDawg on March 24, 2005, 11:04:30 pm
What's more funny is the first-timers who do the anal part first, and then the blowjob for a big finish.

MMMM-mmm!
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Pedro Picasso on March 24, 2005, 11:06:47 pm
According to my cousin who is recently back from Afghanistan, Muslim men in that country are all about some anal for similar reasons.  All beards and back doors, those fighters.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: AugustWest on March 24, 2005, 11:58:11 pm
Quote from: "AlohaDawg"
What's more funny is the first-timers who do the anal part first, and then the blowjob for a big finish.

MMMM-mmm!


Tastes like....pistachios?
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Va on March 25, 2005, 09:25:46 pm
My first husband was a virgin when we got together, and while it was really sweet getting to be someone's first, I was always worried by the fact that he had only ever had sex with me.  How could he not be curious about having sex with other people?  Hell, if he had cheated on me, I might have given him a pass on it.  Okay, no, there's no way I would give him a pass, but I would have understood.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: AlohaDawg on March 25, 2005, 09:37:47 pm
I guess the real point is that everyone is different. I've met people who are really, truly monogamous and I've met people who have absolutely zero ability to be monogamous. And then people change over time, too....like when they have kids, for example.

More important, I think, than the individual's behavior is the relationship - you adjust yourself and/or the relationship if you both want to be in it. So horndog freaks wind up calming down, or strict puritan types become less so in accepting their partners foibles, or they both become swingers, or whatever...but either people are alone or together, and if together, than adjustments happen or they wind up alone again. What you value is a big factor that drives behavior.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Bozack on March 26, 2005, 12:02:45 am
Quote from: "Va"
...while it was really sweet getting to be someone's first, I was always worried by the fact that he had only ever had sex with me.  How could he not be curious about having sex with other people?...


I have the same sort of weirdness about my current girlfriend. I mean, I'm the ONLY ONE! If she says that sex was good, I can't help but wonder what she's comparing it to. But, of course, it's a lot less frightening when you're just dating.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: miles on March 26, 2005, 08:34:02 am
Quote from: "Bozack"
Quote from: "Va"
...while it was really sweet getting to be someone's first, I was always worried by the fact that he had only ever had sex with me.  How could he not be curious about having sex with other people?...


I have the same sort of weirdness about my current girlfriend. I mean, I'm the ONLY ONE! If she says that sex was good, I can't help but wonder what she's comparing it to. But, of course, it's a lot less frightening when you're just dating.


My current ladyfriend is my first, but we've been dating on and off for quite some time, so she's not my only.  And I wasn't totally inexperienced before her, just officially inexperienced.  She said it was weird for her, and she was really a bit reluctant to steal my innocence, but she couldn't resist, of course.  Now, she speaks of it like it was some kind of accomplishment.  

Actually, I had to beg.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Carlos del Vaca on March 28, 2005, 05:36:37 pm
I find it curious that a thread about my second-born turned into a discussion of the merits of waiting until marriage.

Not that I'm complainin', just pointing out.  Carry on.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: CortJstr on March 28, 2005, 11:44:31 pm
Quote from: "carlosdelvaca"
I find it curious that a thread about my second-born turned into a discussion of the merits of waiting until marriage.

Not that I'm complainin', just pointing out.  Carry on.

Actually this could qualify for a Least Wandering Thread Award.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Bobby Isosceles on March 29, 2005, 04:18:40 pm
On the subject of new babies:

WORST BABY NAME ON EARTH. (http://www.newbabynews.net/hospitals/mmc1/public/mmc1birthannouncement.pl?babyID=h1-4161)
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: St_Zartan on March 29, 2005, 04:36:21 pm
Quote from: "Bobby Isosceles"
On the subject of new babies:

WORST BABY NAME ON EARTH. (http://www.newbabynews.net/hospitals/mmc1/public/mmc1birthannouncement.pl?babyID=h1-4161)


WHOA RIGHT THERE DUDE

HOLY SHIT

MERCY MEDICAL CENTER CLEARLY DOES NOT HAVE A "DECISION-MAKING PROCESS" DEPARTMENT
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: side_show on March 29, 2005, 04:39:13 pm
Quote from: "Bobby Isosceles"
On the subject of new babies:

WORST BABY NAME ON EARTH. (http://www.newbabynews.net/hospitals/mmc1/public/mmc1birthannouncement.pl?babyID=h1-4161)


What?  What?!

FYI: my friend who works in the neo-natal ward called to tell me that a teen mother had named her daughter Cherish Maya Beaver.  None of the other nurses could believe it either. (Beaver is a common last name amoung Aboriginal Canadians)
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: CortJstr on March 29, 2005, 04:44:41 pm
Quote from: "Bobby Isosceles"
On the subject of new babies:

WORST BABY NAME ON EARTH. (http://www.newbabynews.net/hospitals/mmc1/public/mmc1birthannouncement.pl?babyID=h1-4161)

Up until just now the worst I'd heard was in this weekend's news:

Quote from: "The Saturday Swindle Sheet #86"
Jonathan Davis, of Korn, and his wife, porn actress Deven, named their newborn son Pirate. This is not a joke.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: arkabee on March 29, 2005, 04:52:00 pm
you know those morings you have that reaffirm your position that you don't like other people.  those mornings where you can take your experiences, wrap them up in a napkin, and use them to wipe away any crumbs of acceptance off your dry lips?

ya, it was one of those mornings.

but, i must say, that little Miss Aryan Justice certainly does make me feel Right and Correct.

If only there was an easy way that i knew of to balance my belief in the Right of Others to Do Things They Want with my belief in the Obligation of Others Not to be Complete and Utterly Complicit Assholes.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Nabubrush on March 29, 2005, 10:55:20 pm
Quote from: "arkabee"
If only there was an easy way that i knew of to balance my belief in the Right of Others to Do Things They Want with my belief in the Obligation of Others Not to be Complete and Utterly Complicit Assholes.


You hit the fuck out of that nail.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Pedro Picasso on March 29, 2005, 11:43:16 pm
Quote from: "Bobby Isosceles"
On the subject of new babies:

WORST BABY NAME ON EARTH. (http://www.newbabynews.net/hospitals/mmc1/public/mmc1birthannouncement.pl?babyID=h1-4161)


That baby does look like a bit of a bruiser.  All slamming her fist into her palm.  All appearing as if she would like to know whether or not she looks like a clown to you.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Va on March 30, 2005, 04:06:46 pm
Am I the only one who thinks she looks like both her parents and grandparents were brother and sister?
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Mite on March 31, 2005, 01:14:57 am
Quote from: "Va"
Am I the only one who thinks she looks like both her parents and grandparents were brother and sister?


Seconded. Unlike your baby, Va, which makes me try to tickle my monitor every time I see your avatar. Oh, and your baby is perfect too, JL/Pedro. And Carlos, yours will be beautiful too. And everybody else who's spawned lately, delayed congratulations. Including Phillip from Goats, who does not read these boards.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Pedro Picasso on March 31, 2005, 08:24:51 pm
The day is always a little nicer when Mite stops by  :D
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Mite on April 01, 2005, 12:12:51 am
Awww, shucks Pedro, thanks. It is my New Month's Resolution to post more often. I lurk constantly, but I am shy.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: V-Adore on April 03, 2005, 07:56:02 pm
Belated-ish congratulations to Carlos and family. Whatever you name the baby, may she be healthy and happy. (But "Aryan Justice" is not a good idea.)
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Pedro Picasso on April 25, 2005, 07:46:44 pm
He smiles! (http://www.x-omega.com/Pearce/Smiles)

_______________________
Jubilation.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Beatrice on April 25, 2005, 08:53:40 pm
Oh crap, you people are using up all the Cute!
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: arkabee on April 25, 2005, 10:04:18 pm
oh my, that's quite adorable now isn't it?
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: antioch on May 05, 2005, 11:49:22 am
Babies...millions of little babies...
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Pedro Picasso on May 11, 2005, 08:07:14 pm
Recently bought the book On Becoming Baby Wise after three recommendations from parents I know.  I still haven't finished reading it.  Funny what kids will do to the amount of time you can spend reading about kids.  Noticed a few things kind of off.  One of the authors is Gary Ezzo, M.A.  But it doesn't ever say what arts he is the master of.  Early in the book, it basically says that two parent households are essential for child development.  And then throws a lame "but single parents are doing the best they can."

I liked the promises of regularity and kids that sleep when they're sleepy and only cry when something's wrong.  Also some of the statistics presented in the book (though they weren't backed up with names of journals or anything) were very reassuring.  JL now points out that the thing is written by a pastor and is widely dismissed by pediatricians as being worthless or dangerous.

I am a fool.  No matter how much I think on how a person can't trust the trusted sources around him, I'm still taken in by stuff like this.  I don't want easy answers, but I at least want to know that when my child can't fall asleep without us holding onto him, that's perfectly normal and not going to screw anybody up more than is necessary.

Also, easy answers would be nice.

_________
Dejected.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Carlos del Vaca on May 11, 2005, 08:14:39 pm
Our favoritest baby-wrangling advice book was Secrets of the Baby Whisperer (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0345440900/qid=1115842290/sr=8-1/ref=pd_csp_1/103-5798183-1242247?v=glance&s=books&n=507846).  Despite the British author obnoxiously trying to write British ("Your baby is fine, luv!"), it had good stuff.  She runs down the variations on baby cries and what they often mean (if baby is hungry, it'll sound such as this...), and behold they were largely right.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: AlohaDawg on May 12, 2005, 04:56:50 am
The more parenting I do, the more I realize that:

Nearly ALL the books are full of crap.

Also MOST other people are 1/2 full of crap.


If you are a normal, well adjusted person you will do fine for the most part following your instincts. Our race has survived for millions of years without trying to follow 100 disparate opinions about child rearing. Listen to yourself, we are hardwired to perpetuate our species.

In general, babies tell you what they need and want. Spend time with your child and you'll catch on quick. But that's the key - spending time concentrating on your child.

I agree that a two parent, opposite sex household is the ideal situation as long as they are in a functional relationship and sharing responsibility. That's not to say single parents or gay couples are bad parents but I believe that both gender viewpoints are important and that children model relationships after the one they see the most growing up.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: AugustWest on May 12, 2005, 05:05:20 am
Quote from: "AlohaDawg"

If you are a normal, well adjusted person you will do fine for the most part following your instincts. Our race has survived for millions of years without trying to follow 100 disparate opinions about child rearing. Listen to yourself, we are hardwired to perpetuate our species.


I whole-heartedly agree.  This shit ain't rocket science, it's nurturing DAMMIT  !
Somehow gibbons, ocelots and chickens are able to sucessfully able to raise their offspring without a glib handbook.  If you have normal human instincts you'll be able to too.

The unfortunate thing is that so many humans with abnormal instincts have babies.  Thankfully nobody here falls into that category.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: CortJstr on May 12, 2005, 01:10:09 pm
Quote from: "AugustWest"
The unfortunate thing is that so many humans with abnormal instincts have babies.  Thankfully nobody here falls into that category.

Uh, we wrote 16460 messages about a comic strip. I'd hardly call that a normal instinct.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Pedro Picasso on May 12, 2005, 07:32:07 pm
Quote from: "AlohaDawg"
Our race has survived for millions of years without trying to follow 100 disparate opinions about child rearing.


Thanks for the reassurance.  I think the main reason I feel the need for books is that I'm not living with an extended family where I'm constantly innundated with the wisdom of the ages.  I trouble with my instincts because my instincts generally involve eating tons of ice cream.  Still I love this kid so much, and I'm starting to get confident that I can provide what he needs.

Quote from: "AlohaDawg"
I agree that a two parent, opposite sex household is the ideal situation as long as they are in a functional relationship and sharing responsibility.


I also think it's the ideal situation, but I wouldn't want a book ostensibly about child psychology to preach that to me because it is actually based on theology.  Also, he's a bit heavy handed about it.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: arkabee on May 12, 2005, 07:53:18 pm
Quote from: "Pedro Picasso"
Also, he's a bit heavy handed about it.


like reading a pamphlet on how to treat snake bites, wherein every other sentence it says "the best way would have been not to have been bitten by a snake.  you should not chase snakes with rakes.  leave the snake alone, dude."

like, thanks man, but that doesn't help me with my asp problem right now.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Va on May 15, 2005, 07:53:49 pm
Spotted on Fark: Another unfortunate baby name. (http://www.harrisonhospital.org/whatsnew/nursery.php?action=details&ID=6069)
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Limmo on May 16, 2005, 12:43:34 am
That hurt my brain, Va.  That really hurt.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: AlohaDawg on May 16, 2005, 06:56:25 am
Some people should not be allowed to play games OR breed.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Golfhaus on May 16, 2005, 02:14:02 pm
Quote from: "Va"
Spotted on Fark: Another unfortunate baby name. (http://www.harrisonhospital.org/whatsnew/nursery.php?action=details&ID=6069)


Boo to that... I foresee an entire life of being asked for their name and them being asked, "Excuse me, what was that?" Then being asked to spell it. Then told what a unique name it is. Then being asked where it's from. Then being asked, "Your parents are a little weird, aren't they?"
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Pedro Picasso on May 16, 2005, 02:28:39 pm
I knew a Seph in college.  He was never fun to be with.

If the fantasy was final, why'd it have eleven sequels?

___________
Chocobo.
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: arkabee on May 16, 2005, 04:11:18 pm
Quote from: "Pedro Picasso"
I knew a Seph in college.  He was never fun to be with.

If the fantasy was final, why'd it have eleven sequels?



why do people name their children after "famous" evil people?

"Hello, i'd like you to meet my daughter: Adolf Lucifer Damien Gacy Drakul Gannon Bubonic Smith the 3rd.  she's cute but for some reason a little antisocial, if she starts gnawing on your ankle, spray her with water."

wtf?!?
Title: MORE BABIES! BABIES EVERYWHERE!
Post by: Carlos del Vaca on May 16, 2005, 08:24:24 pm
Quote from: "arkabee"
"Hello, i'd like you to meet my daughter: Adolf Lucifer Damien Gacy Drakul Gannon Bubonic Smith the 3rd.  she's cute but for some reason a little antisocial, if she starts gnawing on your ankle, spray her with water."


Recent conversation with my daughter.
Carlos:  What should we name your little sister?
Lizzie:  LIZZEEEEE!
Carlos:  No, you're Lizzie.  What about your sister?
Lizzie:  Lizzie sister?
Carlos:  Do you like...Jacqueline?
Lizzie:  Uh huh.
Carlos:  Do you like...Catherine?
Lizzie:  Uh huh.
Carlos:  Do you like...Stephanie?
Lizzie:  Uh huh.
Carlos:  Do you like...Adolph?
Lizzie:  Uh huh.
Carlos:  Do you like...Kazynski?
Lizzie:  Uh huh.