The OFFICIAL Unofficial Achewood Message Board

Achewood => Achewood => Topic started by: robot_roll_call on April 05, 2005, 05:58:46 am

Title: 4/05/05- Map 2: Back in the Habit
Post by: robot_roll_call on April 05, 2005, 05:58:46 am
Why do I need to start all the map threads around here?

Also, I don't see The Smoke on the listing there. Hmm.
Title: 4/05/05- Map 2: Back in the Habit
Post by: V-Adore on April 05, 2005, 06:47:28 am
You know, I looked for the teppanyaki place? And it was there. I've never felt so smug and so geekly before, at least not at this time in the morning.

Also, the "no dogs" thing is more clearly enunciated here. Is there any particular reason why dogs appear to be the only non-sentient wee fuzzy animals? One wonders.

EDIT: I suspect the Smoke is underground even by Underground standards. This also only appears to be the "suburby" bits of it; there's probably further grottiness deeper down.

And does Philippe ever go to school? I mean, there's a K-8. He's five. It was mentioned he was starting. Does he? OH SNAP, A DANGLING PLOT THREAD
Title: 4/05/05- Map 2: Back in the Habit
Post by: jough on April 05, 2005, 08:00:44 am
Oh man, the legend makes the earlier map worthwhile.

Onstad shows me again how much I'm missing out on - with SCIENCE.

Nicely played, old friend, nicely played.
Title: 4/05/05- Map 2: Back in the Habit
Post by: arkabee on April 05, 2005, 01:21:24 pm
Quote from: "V-Adore"

Also, the "no dogs" thing is more clearly enunciated here. Is there any particular reason why dogs appear to be the only non-sentient wee fuzzy animals? One wonders.


As much as i love most dogs, i've never met another domesticated animal type that eats its own poop.
Title: 4/05/05- Map 2: Back in the Habit
Post by: Franz. on April 05, 2005, 01:22:20 pm
Quote from: "V-Adore"
Also, the "no dogs" thing is more clearly enunciated here. Is there any particular reason why dogs appear to be the only non-sentient wee fuzzy animals? One wonders.


I'll bet that they actually are sentient, but there's a massive prejudice against them among the Underground community. In the Underground future, I envision a civil rights movement, with dogs marching on the Underground manhole covers &c. I think we are in the early days of canine integration.

[ Franz. ]
Title: 4/05/05- Map 2: Back in the Habit
Post by: AugustWest on April 05, 2005, 02:24:48 pm
Dachshunds!
Title: 4/05/05- Map 2: Back in the Habit
Post by: PinkStainlessTail on April 05, 2005, 02:51:53 pm
Cute. I still think The Underground concept is stupid though.

HEY IN BLOOM COUNTY WHY COULD THE ANIMALS TALK AND RUN FOR PRESDINT IN THE HUMAN WORLD THEY SHOULD HALF TO GO TO SPECIAL ANIMAL WORLD AND RUN FOR ANIMAL PRESDINT!!!1!!
Title: 4/05/05- Map 2: Back in the Habit
Post by: Golfhaus on April 05, 2005, 04:08:09 pm
I don't know... I like the concept of the Underground. It explains the lack of a lot of non-Onstad human interaction, while at the same time making it less like Garfield.

I still don't understand how the cats can live in houses above ground. It's obvious that the animals are trying to keep their culture - nay, their sentience - hidden, and yet they appear to live (in an earlier map) in houses that belong to them.

Unless... unless Ray is squatting in some billionaire's mansion that the old guy forgot he even had?
Title: 4/05/05- Map 2: Back in the Habit
Post by: CortJstr on April 05, 2005, 04:28:21 pm
Quote from: "Golfhaus"
Unless... unless Ray is squatting in some billionaire's mansion that the old guy forgot he even had?

I know at one point Ray was "missing" and there were fliers up for him from human owners but that's the last we heard from them.

And the map makers need to get with the program, don't they know BankOne was bought by Chase? But at least Under##### Time is still open. Otherwise Beef would be even more depressed.
Title: 4/05/05- Map 2: Back in the Habit
Post by: Gimpson on April 05, 2005, 04:50:22 pm
I would also like to point out that it is lunchtime, I am hungry, and I really wish I could eat lunch at the Chili Pepper Lunch Company.
Title: 4/05/05- Map 2: Back in the Habit
Post by: V-Adore on April 05, 2005, 05:08:31 pm
Quote from: "CortJstr"
Quote from: "Golfhaus"
Unless... unless Ray is squatting in some billionaire's mansion that the old guy forgot he even had?

I know at one point Ray was "missing" and there were fliers up for him from human owners but that's the last we heard from them.

Yeah, there seems to have been a gradual change -- Ray originally had human owners, and the main house's crew had to jump through hoops in human society to get anything done. (Remember the old strips about attempting to order pizza and failing? Hell, remember the "attempting to steal the pizza guy's car" strip?) But gradually things have become more alive-stuffed-animal- and cat-friendly, apparently; note that a gonzo porn outfit friendly to alive stuffed animals moved in across from the Onstads, for example.

I think this may be Onstad's way of telling us that introspection and universe analysis is desperately overrated. But hey -- if massive incongruities and shifting continuity didn't dissuade Doctor Who fans, it won't dissuade me.
Title: 4/05/05- Map 2: Back in the Habit
Post by: miles on April 05, 2005, 05:54:08 pm
Quote from: "V-Adore"
Also, the "no dogs" thing is more clearly enunciated here. Is there any particular reason why dogs appear to be the only non-sentient wee fuzzy animals? One wonders.


Quote from: "Golfhaus"
It's obvious that the animals are trying to keep their culture - nay, their sentience - hidden, and yet they appear to live (in an earlier map) in houses that belong to them.


Wait a minute--it seems that the idea of consciousness in non-human animals has been denied here.  Do both of you really believe that non-human animals aren't sentient beings?  You're in good company, I guess, with Descartes, but it seems that most people today accept the idea of sentience in at least some animals (cats, dogs and other mammals, at least).

Unless you were just referring to the alive stuffed animals, who indeed have tried to hide their sentience from early on (http://achewood.com/index.php?date=10312001).

This is what happens when you are reading the message board and a paper on environmental ethics at the same time.  I apologize.
Title: 4/05/05- Map 2: Back in the Habit
Post by: jough on April 05, 2005, 06:25:16 pm
I like it when the animals in the pictures do funny things.
Title: 4/05/05- Map 2: Back in the Habit
Post by: V-Adore on April 05, 2005, 06:28:08 pm
Quote from: "miles"
Quote from: "V-Adore"
Also, the "no dogs" thing is more clearly enunciated here. Is there any particular reason why dogs appear to be the only non-sentient wee fuzzy animals? One wonders.


Quote from: "Golfhaus"
It's obvious that the animals are trying to keep their culture - nay, their sentience - hidden, and yet they appear to live (in an earlier map) in houses that belong to them.


Wait a minute--it seems that the idea of consciousness in non-human animals has been denied here.  Do both of you really believe that non-human animals aren't sentient beings?  You're in good company, I guess, with Descartes, but it seems that most people today accept the idea of sentience in at least some animals (cats, dogs and other mammals, at least).

Unless you were just referring to the alive stuffed animals, who indeed have tried to hide their sentience from early on (http://achewood.com/index.php?date=10312001).

This is what happens when you are reading the message board and a paper on environmental ethics at the same time.  I apologize.

Well, uh... that really depends what you mean by "sentience." I was referring to it in terms of "human-like": i.e., capable of speech, wearing clothes, bipedalism, eating a hamburger properly, etc. I mean, even the rabbits have a public health system, but Achewood dogs don't appear capable of that. (Although, admittedly, Scrambles could talk...)

I don't want to get into a semantics war, but you appear to be using "sentience" in the way that most ethologists would use "consciousness" and other similar terms. There are certainly claims that animals (from pigs to octopi) are conscious, but it's hard to prove experimentally... but sentient is another question entirely. Anyway. Enough of this.
Title: 4/05/05- Map 2: Back in the Habit
Post by: wombat on April 05, 2005, 07:50:17 pm
Who is Vincent J. Lemoni?
Title: 4/05/05- Map 2: Back in the Habit
Post by: Golfhaus on April 05, 2005, 08:04:46 pm
Quote from: "miles"
Wait a minute--it seems that the idea of consciousness in non-human animals has been denied here.  Do both of you really believe that non-human animals aren't sentient beings?


What V-Adore said. Animals have personalities, and then there are creatures like ants and bees that have what could be called communties, but they aren't building shopping centers and going to see the Mets play. That was how I was referring to it.

Quote from: "wombat"
Who is Vincent J. Lemoni?


The gynmasium at Little Nephew's school is named for him (http://charleysmuckles.blogspot.com/2004/10/where-i-been-yall.html). For now.
Title: 4/05/05- Map 2: Back in the Habit
Post by: jough on April 05, 2005, 08:07:13 pm
Quote from: "wombat"
Who is Vincent J. Lemoni?


He's billionaire (feline) investor (http://www.achewood.com/index.php?date=04012005) who developed the underground in 1945.

Did you miss Friday's strip about the history of the Underground?  Today's strip is part 2 of 2 to its part 1.
Title: 4/05/05- Map 2: Back in the Habit
Post by: CortJstr on April 05, 2005, 08:16:06 pm
Quote from: "V-Adore"
I think this may be Onstad's way of telling us that introspection and universe analysis is desperately overrated. But hey -- if massive incongruities and shifting continuity didn't dissuade Doctor Who fans, it won't dissuade me.

I would guess it's equal parts Onstad attempting to throw off geeks such as ourselves by altering canon and the rules of the Acheverse and him just decided the "hiding from humans" thing was too limiting as he originally set it up.
Title: 4/05/05- Map 2: Back in the Habit
Post by: wombat on April 05, 2005, 09:52:05 pm
Quote from: "jough"
Quote from: "wombat"
Who is Vincent J. Lemoni?


He's billionaire (feline) investor (http://www.achewood.com/index.php?date=04012005) who developed the underground in 1945.

Did you miss Friday's strip about the history of the Underground?  Today's strip is part 2 of 2 to its part 1.


Ah.  I see.  I did see it on Friday but I guess I forgot. I have a migraine today and my brain is not functioning and I thought it would take some serious CortJstring to find out, rather than just reading the previous day's strip....  Thank you.
Title: 4/05/05- Map 2: Back in the Habit
Post by: Suckin_Dick on April 05, 2005, 09:53:11 pm
as to the sentience question and no-dogs policy.  I think that it is not so much that the dogs are not sentient as there is a wide spread bigotry and "specism" in the achewood underground.  Y'know back in the antebellum days they refused learnin to their slaves, afterwards there was segregation, in fact, black people were often compared to DOGS for their supposedly DOGLIKE behavior.

coincidence?

probably.
Title: 4/05/05- Map 2: Back in the Habit
Post by: AugustWest on April 05, 2005, 10:32:03 pm
Quote from: "CortJstr"
And the map makers need to get with the program, don't they know BankOne was bought by Chase?


They're still called BankOne around here.  And I still send my mortgage payment to BankOne and not Chase.
Title: 4/05/05- Map 2: Back in the Habit
Post by: CortJstr on April 05, 2005, 11:12:01 pm
Quote from: "AugustWest"
Quote from: "CortJstr"
And the map makers need to get with the program, don't they know BankOne was bought by Chase?

They're still called BankOne around here.  And I still send my mortgage payment to BankOne and not Chase.

Not for long. Go to bankone.com. The Chase logo has higher billing. This month my credit card payments changed over.
Title: 4/05/05- Map 2: Back in the Habit
Post by: Suckin_Dick on April 06, 2005, 04:17:02 am
i wonder what currency is exchanged in the achewood underground.

have there been any references to dollars within the underground?  if they don't use dollars i bet it is rubles.


just a feeling.
Title: 4/05/05- Map 2: Back in the Habit
Post by: Max on April 06, 2005, 04:30:29 am
also: is it possible to be figuratively disgusting?
Title: 4/05/05- Map 2: Back in the Habit
Post by: Ben-San on April 06, 2005, 04:57:47 am
Quote from: "Suckin_Dick"
i wonder what currency is exchanged in the achewood underground.

have there been any references to dollars within the underground?  if they don't use dollars i bet it is rubles.


just a feeling.


Well, Beef's receipts (http://www.achewood.com/index.php?date=08182003) seem to be in dollars.
Title: 4/05/05- Map 2: Back in the Habit
Post by: MattFish on April 06, 2005, 07:01:55 am
I wonder what they sell at "Quie?"?
Title: 4/05/05- Map 2: Back in the Habit
Post by: CortJstr on April 06, 2005, 01:19:45 pm
Quote from: "Suckin_Dick"
i wonder what currency is exchanged in the achewood underground.

have there been any references to dollars within the underground?  if they don't use dollars i bet it is rubles.

Beef's Me Day (http://www.achewood.com/index.php?date=08182003) springs to mind,

Plus Teodor's shrooms (http://www.achewood.com/index.php?date=10042001).

[edit: I didn't notice there was a 2nd page and that Ben-San already got the receipt. Damn me.]