The OFFICIAL Unofficial Achewood Message Board
Trivial Pursuits => Wild Card => Topic started by: alreadyinuse on October 13, 2009, 04:56:44 am
-
okay, some people may not appreciate this thread, but whatever.
so okay, obviously, child porn is not a good thing.
and restriction on free speech is a bad thing.
okay, so you've got this animated child porn, right, lolicon or whatever the hell it's called. I have no idea how big the market for the stuff is, but it's gotta be fairly significant considering how many perverts there are out there.
background info:
while there are certainly valid arguments to be made against permitting animated child porn, it turns out to be very messy and complicated to enforce restrictions on the stuff, because whatever system you try to devise runs a terribly high risk of running afoul of various rights that people have, and how do you decide what is and isn't an underage cartoon in a fair and consistent manner, and how can you penalize (no pun intended) and put prior restraint on someone for something on the theory that it might contribute to the delinquency of someone else... right... If you say that animated child porn shouldn't be allowed because the sicko perverts who consume the stuff are feeding an addiction and that their addiction only grows stronger and they are then more likely to go out and commit sex crimes against children, well shit, then you have to make all sorts of other shit illegal too... shit like violent video games... you know for damn sure some kids playing violent video games are more likely to go and assault other kids because of the video game indoctrination... and so on... it's all a big messy question, and so far, as far as I'm aware, the courts (in the US anyways) have basically said 'knock yourself you with animated child porn.' although you might not be allowed to send that shit through the us mail, I don't know how the post office views it.
okay... so here's my idea, right...
you got these kids sending nude pictures of their ding dongs and their vagjayjays to each other on the iphones, right...
and you got these sex toys you can buy at the sex toy stores... which are basically life-size models of porn star body c*ckcis and vajayjays. made out of ultra-life-like materials and I think you can put hot water in them to make them body temperature and whatever.
This fuck*ng technology is getting cheaper and cheaper all the fuck*ng time, and it's getting to where now a fuck*ng iphone can do shit that it used to take a room full of super computers to do, if you could do it at all.
so... my point is.. maybe in a few years it will be possible to scan your nekked body with your iphone, and order up a life-size silicone copy of yourself, anatomically correct, possibly even anatomically enhanced, but whatever, you get the idea... you scan your self with the iphone3d or whatever, and a week later the UPS guy shows up at your door with YOU in a box.
so you unwrap it, and you can start having sex with yourself
what got me thinking about this is I was reading this story :
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2009/09/24/violetblue0924.DTL
April Flores is interviewed about a sex toy that was made of her vajayjay, and here is what she says:
"It took about six months from the molding process to receive a prototype. The very first thing I noticed about the toy was its substantial weight. It weighs almost eight pounds, and I kept joking that it was my baby. I could not stop studying the toy up close because I had never seen my pu$$y from that angle without the use of a mirror. It was truly surreal how realistic it looked and felt. Cyberskin warms to body temperature and feels just like human flesh so I just kept squeezing its thighs and belly, watching it jiggle. We also had fun taking pictures with my legs spread holding the toy directly in front of the area that was replicated. The resulting pictures are some of the strangest I have posted on my blog.
"
so now here is my question... what if the person who gets the life size sex doll made of her/him self is under age? I mean keep in mind we are talking really fuck*ng high resolution (no pun intended). I mean, not just vajyajay or c*ck, but the whole body, right, my theoretical sex doll of the future... AN EXACT fuck*ng COPY of yourself.
so I mean, say you're only 14 years old, or 12, or 7, right, and you get a doll copy of yourself made... I mean, maybe the technology has gotten to the point where it isn't made in a factory where the people making it would be like "we're not gonna make this for anyone under 18" maybe it would be like, a home kit where you dump some silicone and a bunch of nanobots into your bathtub and a few hours later they've knitted you your very own sex doll.
so some kid does this right, and then what if the kid starts fuck*ng his/her own sex doll of him/her self??? what then??? is the kid engaging in child porn?
what if the kid gives the sex doll to his/her gf/bf? What if they each make a sex doll of each other and hump the living daylights out of each other's sex dolls? are they both guilty of having sent to each other and received from each other child porn?
okay and then on a more plausible plane of thought, setting the sex dolls aside for the moment, before we are able to make sex dolls, the ability to make virtual sex dolls will probably happen first... where you scan your nekked body in with an iphone, right, and then voila - it's an ultra high resolution copy of yourself in 3D...
now here is my question... is the copy of yourself... is it... child porn if you're underage? what if you strip out all the color and strip it down to a wire frame? What if you edit out the c*ck and/or vajayjay (hey, some kids have both) and the bresteses, and you just leave that shit edited out, all blurred out or whatever...
now, is that child porn? What if you send a copy of your 3D self to your bf/gf, and your bf/gf puts it in their playstation, and they have some kinda program that lets them make the 3D likeness of you do all sorts of lewed stuff... like, they might have a 3D lemur on the playstation or maybe like a whole group of 3D lemurs and next thing you know they have made a movie of your 3D likeness gang-banging a bunch of lemurs, with your privates all blurred out... if you are underage, is that child porn? now what if you replace the blurred out genitals with some sort of generic genitals, or with the genitals of someone who is over 18? is that child porn?
:) ;) :D ;D >:( :( 8) ??? ::) :P :-[ :-X :-\ :-* :'(
-
holy shit this board automatically edits out p3n1s and va61na.
they each get replaced as such:
c*ck <----p3n1s
pu$$y <--- va61na
that's just fuck*ng stupid.
-
this is one of the funniest things ever.
yes.
-
TL DR
So to sum up, Rule 34 dictates that Theseus would try to fuck his own ship. And then both of his own ships.
Trolling protip: highbrow and verbose are two different things
-
Laws regarding animated or drawn depictions of sex with or among underage characters vary by region and are not consistently enforced. They are a major front for free speech vs. obscenity laws, and you could research the subject for hours and days without coming to the end of it.
I guess what I'm getting at is that you also aren't the first person who ever wondered if maybe the entire universe is, like, inside a single atom in some dude's brain, even though it seems like you probably are when you think of it while lit.
-
Hey everybody, I know! Let's all pay attention to Alreadyinuse!