Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Trains are saying "hello".  All this time, we just snub them.

Poll

Do you think that Karr really did it?

Yes
No
I'm not sure
Indifferent/Don't care

Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Author Topic: New developments in JonBenet Ramsey case?  (Read 7760 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Doc

  • Growing Cucumbers of Impressive Dimensions
  • Writer's Workshoppers
  • Philippe is standing on it.
  • *
  • Tiny cans of Dr Pepper: 1408
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5017
  • an emergency backup pug
    • View Profile
Re: New developments in JonBenet Ramsey case?
« Reply #30 on: August 30, 2006, 07:21:21 am »

Between this and the titty toast you are just downright sassy today AD.
Logged
Inev: 'A lot of things are ridiculous if you think about them long enough, you know?'

CortJstr

  • Mod Squad
  • Philippe is standing on it
  • Tiny cans of Dr Pepper: 338
  • Online Online
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 9820
  • Which gives us AN EXCUSE TO DRINK!
    • View Profile
Re: New developments in JonBenet Ramsey case?
« Reply #31 on: August 30, 2006, 01:01:25 pm »

"my client is outraged that he is not allowed to stay in Thai jail."

I wish there were a new form of punctuation which indicated an imaginary quote.

Just put brackets around it. It's already well established newspaper code for "the person didn't actually say this but we're going to pretend that he did because god forbid our readers see what was actually said."
Logged

Hobot

  • DISK ONE OF SIX
  • Teodor
  • Tiny cans of Dr Pepper: 21
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 861
  • Appearing in a tortilla near you.
    • View Profile
    • Your music is inadequate.
Re: New developments in JonBenet Ramsey case?
« Reply #32 on: August 30, 2006, 04:45:02 pm »

Just put brackets around it. It's already well established newspaper code for "the person didn't actually say this but we're going to pretend that he did because god forbid our readers see what was actually said."

As far as I know, that's done only to elaborate upon or clarify what the quoted individual has said.  I'd certainly hope that journalistic integrity would prevent essentially making up entire quotations in that manner.

Another alternative would be to introduce the quotation so as to explicitly show it is fantasy: "The attorney would be all, 'my client is outraged that he is not allowed to stay in Thai jail.'"

Or you could just not care quite so much.
Logged
You had me at "I dig both ladies and fellows."

CortJstr

  • Mod Squad
  • Philippe is standing on it
  • Tiny cans of Dr Pepper: 338
  • Online Online
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 9820
  • Which gives us AN EXCUSE TO DRINK!
    • View Profile
Re: New developments in JonBenet Ramsey case?
« Reply #33 on: August 30, 2006, 05:06:06 pm »

As far as I know, that's done only to elaborate upon or clarify what the quoted individual has said.  I'd certainly hope that journalistic integrity would prevent essentially making up entire quotations in that manner.

It's also used to mask the actual statement just as often. I seriously doubt anybody has ever taken the time to say "bracket expletive bracket" like so many newspapers would have us believe.
Logged

JorgeFabregas

  • roast beef (the middle cat)
  • Tiny cans of Dr Pepper: 93
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1227
  • I was impressed.
    • View Profile
Re: New developments in JonBenet Ramsey case?
« Reply #34 on: August 31, 2006, 05:00:43 am »

Dusty Baker recently said "If I did that (have a pitcher throw 169 pitches in a game), you guys would lynch me." The Chicago Tribune, which owns the team he manages, printed it as "If i did that, you guys would [criticize] me."

Meaning obscured!
Logged
And we know who we should love. But we're never certain how.
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up