Yes, arkabee, I brought the deviled eggs. Yes I forgot the paprika. Yes they suck, but I can't help but notice that you're eating them anyway.
i like the devilled eggs, and as opposite as my intentions turned out to be, it was my poor attempt to say "hey, their her devilled eggs if you don't like them don't eat them" and thank you again for the devilled eggs,
and more importantly,
i thinkt he venue in which you are giving the devilled eggs away is excellent, ie i think the book club idea is an excellent idea, especially giventhe nature and "community" of this particular forum.
also, i am a lout, and apologize for putting my feet on your coffee table and will do my utmost to stfu and stop eating all the eggs and leave some for the other people and etc.
As for the whole democracy and it's failings thing,
i am, in hindsight, full of shit because the founder of the book club in question is proposing a democratic choice fo books; proposing the scenario from the book club founder's position of absolute authority as founder of said book club. the, um, duality?, dichotomy?, um, the SOMETHING of the situation should have jumped out and hit me in the face with the obviousness of it and such i went off on an ill-conceived and absolutely unnecessary and completely counter productive tangent to the argument in my hand which was:
the book club founder can do what ever they want.
which, my issue with book voting, had i taken the time to think, clearly shows that the book club founder is doing what they want for the book club.
i have proposed a judgement and cited example
to uphold the judgement, and concluded the judgement as correct, all the while the example proves the exact opposite of what i had judged. i am an idiot and best reserved for a stand in for Goofus in an episode of "Goofus and Gallant".