Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[jaydub]

If you've got enough that it flops around, that's not really comfortable, you know?

August wins the thread. The rest of you apparently believe that the main function of the female body is to be looked at rather than to be lived in.  It's not all about you, you know?

I was similarly entertained. 

Second paragraph QFT. 

Uncle Cecil weighs in on this matter of gravity:

[wombat]

And again, being a guy, Unc concludes that it's mostly about being looked at.

[dejavroom]

Yes. Because it's impossible for a man to actually empathize with and understand the plight that is womanhood.

Well, that works both ways, in that I don't know why you think you have us all figured out, when "looking" at the female body, for most guys I know, would be kinda of a secondary concern/bonus type of thing...

[theinevitable]

I think it is easy to come to that conclusion when reading things written by women which say that.

[dejavroom]

Hm?

[wombat]

I would say that if I have the guys "figured out" to any extent on this topic, it's because the guys all have reacted so uniformly. I am merely pointing out a generalization.

I wouldn't expect the ladies to have any better of a sense of what it's like to have the strange bodily protrusions that you guys have. Seriously, talk about something that proves that there is no such thing as intelligent design.

[dejavroom]

I would say that if I have the guys "figured out" to any extent on this topic, it's because the guys all have reacted so uniformly.

They... they really haven't.

Seriously, talk about something that proves that there is no such thing as intelligent design.

The inherent McGyveriness of the Universe, like with the tongue: soft muscle tissue crammed with nerves surrounded by what are basically little knives. It does bozazzle the ganoggin'.

[wombat]

Hey now you gotta plug something in the socket to get the juice flowing, y'know. Form is just following function.

Internal fertilization seems like it was a good development for a lot of reasons. It's more the storage device that seems a bit problematic. Even a lot of mammals don't just leave them hanging out there so vulnerably, you know?

[dejavroom]

As long as you don't backpedal, you should be fine.

[Dangermoose]

So what about the totally bra-less ladies who grow up in the bush and get on National Geographic?  No matter what Uncle Cecil concluded, all you do is turn on National Geographic, you can see right there what a breast will do, over time, in a bra-less state of nature.  There is major support / anti-flop function at work in the underwire.

But that begs the question.  Is the anti-flop function more for comfort, or because we (both male and female) prefer the appearance of supported breasts?  Whereas National Geographic people aren't so hung-up on it either way. Many even seem to lean more towards c*ck-supporting gourd-based fashions.

{Sorry, all I know about anthropology is from television, which I am bad at watching.}

[dejavroom]

I think it is easy to come to that conclusion when reading things written by women which say that.

I have now lit one up and this strikes me as inordinately funny. So there.