The OFFICIAL Unofficial Achewood Message Board

Achewood => Achewood => Topic started by: wombat on January 06, 2009, 08:41:45 pm

Title: Inappropriate Instruments of Affection - Jan 6 2009
Post by: wombat on January 06, 2009, 08:41:45 pm
http://www.achewood.com/index.php?date=01062009 (http://www.achewood.com/index.php?date=01062009)

Not as worth waiting for as some, but at least he's got it out of the way.
Title: Re: Inappropriate Instruments of Affection - Jan 6 2009
Post by: lprkn on January 06, 2009, 08:47:22 pm
The "continuity error" bit made me chuckle for some reason.
Title: Re: Inappropriate Instruments of Affection - Jan 6 2009
Post by: Carlos del Vaca on January 06, 2009, 08:53:03 pm
Coming in 2009:  TODD'S HEAD ON A PIKE!  HELLS YEAH!
Title: Re: Inappropriate Instruments of Affection - Jan 6 2009
Post by: littlefallsmets on January 06, 2009, 09:15:20 pm
I can dig on the idea of a tiny stuffed toy demanding affection in a totalitarian manner.

It's kind of like how I wanna pick up alla the Middle East by the scruffs of their necks, spank them and say "play nice!"
Title: Re: Inappropriate Instruments of Affection - Jan 6 2009
Post by: CortJstr on January 06, 2009, 09:17:19 pm
I can dig on the idea of a tiny stuffed toy demanding affection in a totalitarian manner.

It's kind of like how I wanna pick up alla the Middle East by the scruffs of their necks, spank them and say "play nice!"

Since his "Mr. Poopytime" initiative failed, he had no choice but to escalate his cuddle plans.
Title: Re: Inappropriate Instruments of Affection - Jan 6 2009
Post by: colmore on January 06, 2009, 09:20:31 pm
argh!  cameltoe!

Also, which Gainesville?
Title: Re: Inappropriate Instruments of Affection - Jan 6 2009
Post by: Cap'n Squeakers on January 06, 2009, 09:37:33 pm
argh!  cameltoe!

Thank you, sir, for drawing my attention to something which I now wish I had not seen.  A tiny can of Dr. Pepper (filled with cat urine) is coming your way.
Title: Re: Inappropriate Instruments of Affection - Jan 6 2009
Post by: Bimmicus on January 06, 2009, 09:42:16 pm
Well, that was certainly a comic.
Title: Re: Inappropriate Instruments of Affection - Jan 6 2009
Post by: pmcd9 on January 06, 2009, 10:05:28 pm
I thought the major continuity error was Lyle driving a VW when he sports a Chevy bowtie tattoo.
Title: Re: Inappropriate Instruments of Affection - Jan 6 2009
Post by: herofix on January 06, 2009, 10:08:36 pm
Because I take things literally:

1) Colour of shorts
2) Button on shorts pocket
3) Flies of shorts
4) Eyebrows
5) Shades
6) Medallion
7) Watch
8) Crease in arm
9) Crease in other arm

Any more for any more?

P.S. Darlene? (  <---credit to some person on Assetbar).
Title: Re: Inappropriate Instruments of Affection - Jan 6 2009
Post by: jaydub on January 06, 2009, 11:19:35 pm
argh!  cameltoe!

Also, which Gainesville?
The not-so-classy one.

That was a heinous 'toe.
Title: Re: Inappropriate Instruments of Affection - Jan 6 2009
Post by: Bobby Isosceles on January 07, 2009, 12:38:02 am
Meanwhile, all of you have missed the fact that Ray asked Beef about dinner plans even though he already ate a couple tacos, and Beef clearly did not call him out on this, which means it's something Ray does often.
Title: Re: Inappropriate Instruments of Affection - Jan 6 2009
Post by: Golfhaus on January 07, 2009, 12:46:30 am
Meanwhile, all of you have missed the fact that Ray asked Beef about dinner plans even though he already ate a couple tacos, and Beef clearly did not call him out on this, which means it's something Ray does often.

I read that as Ray getting ready to invite Beef to come over and eat something expensive, and then backpedaling so that he didn't appear to be someone who needed to invite someone to dinner.

A little sad that Achewood being back in full production apparently means a premium update, another fuck*ng sandwich thing (does that even count as Achewood?), and an interview.
Title: Re: Inappropriate Instruments of Affection - Jan 6 2009
Post by: Bobby Isosceles on January 07, 2009, 12:59:08 am
A little sad that Achewood being back in full production apparently means a premium update, another fuck*ng sandwich thing (does that even count as Achewood?), and an interview.

Good sir, I'm not going to pick on you specifically, but I want to point something out:

Please look at today's comic, and maybe the last month or so of comics AT LEAST.

Then, take a look at the first few months of the comic AT LEAST.

In terms of square footage he is producing more than ever.

Not to mention, the art, although still minimalist, has more effort put into it. Hey look, shading! Fonts!

Obviously, this is a decision he has made, because I can't see him producing at a faster rate -- if anything, his rate should have slowed due to the whole baby thing, but was probably compensated for by making this his primary job -- so let's fudge it and say he is producing at about the same rate as before. Thus, he's opting for fewer releases that require more work (the mammalian birthing approach) rather than firing out a bunch of quickies (the amphibian spawning approach).   

This is a decision, with its own costs and benefits associated with it, but it seems that the behind-the-scenes gear-turning is putting out the same amount of BTUs here. So, it's still quite conceivable that it's "full production" -- just with a longer time-to-return.
Title: Re: Inappropriate Instruments of Affection - Jan 6 2009
Post by: Victoria Waterfield on January 07, 2009, 01:03:14 am
he's opting for fewer releases that require more work (the mammalian birthing approach) rather than firing out a bunch of quickies (the amphibian spawning approach).   

r/K Selection Theory (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R/K_selection_theory)  as applied to Achewood. Excellent.
Title: Re: Inappropriate Instruments of Affection - Jan 6 2009
Post by: Bobby Isosceles on January 07, 2009, 01:12:24 am
It makes sense. A fledgeling web comic, without a support structure, fan base or publishing deal is very much like a small rodent in the wilderness. An established web comic, which has seen press in major publications, been published as books, and phas enough of a fan base to have not one but TWO messageboards devoted to Aspergian dissection of its minutiae can go longer without feeding or breeding, so to speak, and thus can devote more resources toward "sentience" -- namely, AchewoodminusRay.


Example:

(http://chiaroscu.ro/rayminusray.gif)
Title: Re: Inappropriate Instruments of Affection - Jan 6 2009
Post by: littlefallsmets on January 07, 2009, 02:40:01 am
Quote from: Bobby Isosceles
Aspergian dissection

To be fair, though, we're more Aspergian and "Tha 'Bar" is more... ass burgerian.
Title: Re: Inappropriate Instruments of Affection - Jan 6 2009
Post by: theinevitable on January 07, 2009, 02:51:53 am
have you guys seen that message board that is just one guy who posted something like 3000 messages? Only he is allowed to post in it, and he stickies some posts, locks some, unlocks some, shuffles posts between boards...

it is upsetting.
Title: Re: Inappropriate Instruments of Affection - Jan 6 2009
Post by: jaydub on January 07, 2009, 02:54:31 am
Dumbrella?
Title: Re: Inappropriate Instruments of Affection - Jan 6 2009
Post by: theinevitable on January 07, 2009, 03:37:20 am
here it is. "the end of the internet." (http://tarisspeed.conforums.com/index.cgi)
Title: Re: Inappropriate Instruments of Affection - Jan 6 2009
Post by: Ruta Bagas on January 07, 2009, 09:36:17 am
Meanwhile, all of you have missed the fact that Ray asked Beef about dinner plans even though he already ate a couple tacos, and Beef clearly did not call him out on this, which means it's something Ray does often.

It could just be...

a continuity error.
Title: Re: Inappropriate Instruments of Affection - Jan 6 2009
Post by: Doc on January 07, 2009, 10:22:34 am
here it is. "the end of the internet." (http://tarisspeed.conforums.com/index.cgi)

I... I love this. This is what the internet was made for.
Title: Re: Inappropriate Instruments of Affection - Jan 6 2009
Post by: pmcd9 on January 07, 2009, 04:40:14 pm
That's one way to keep the trolls away.
Title: Re: Inappropriate Instruments of Affection - Jan 6 2009
Post by: Bobby Isosceles on January 07, 2009, 06:27:57 pm
I... I love this. This is what the internet was made for.

The words "Jough" and "asymptotic" come to mind.
Title: Re: Inappropriate Instruments of Affection - Jan 6 2009
Post by: oball on January 08, 2009, 01:31:18 am
here it is. "the end of the internet." (http://tarisspeed.conforums.com/index.cgi)

Yeah, this thing's been doing the rounds recently.  I saw this blog post (http://regretfulmorning.com/2009/01/4chan-vs-digg-vs-reddit-vs-sa-forums/) today which compares comments about it from Something Awful, Digg, reddit and 4chan.  Guess which group of commenters are the biggest arseholes?
Title: Re: Inappropriate Instruments of Affection - Jan 6 2009
Post by: Doc on January 08, 2009, 02:15:12 am
Yeah, this thing's been doing the rounds recently.  I saw this blog post (http://regretfulmorning.com/2009/01/4chan-vs-digg-vs-reddit-vs-sa-forums/) today which compares comments about it from Something Awful, Digg, reddit and 4chan.  Guess which group of commenters are the biggest arseholes?

Yeah but everyone knows Digg readers are a bunch of pricks.
Title: Re: Inappropriate Instruments of Affection - Jan 6 2009
Post by: smick on January 08, 2009, 03:54:07 am
Yeah, this thing's been doing the rounds recently.  I saw this blog post (http://regretfulmorning.com/2009/01/4chan-vs-digg-vs-reddit-vs-sa-forums/) today which compares comments about it from Something Awful, Digg, reddit and 4chan.  Guess which group of commenters are the biggest arseholes?

I have to say, if they included YouTube they'd throw the rankings.   The modern invention of compound epithets such as "Niggerjew" has allowed the YouTube commenter to push the Racial Slur to Word ratio from the before thought of limit of 1:1 to an astounding 1.25:1, except for one prodigy commenter who is currently working at 3:1, but only when you count "Faggot".