Nabubrush,
For me it solely stems from habit. Usenet was a plaintext arena, and any non-text based markup was _strictly_ verboten.
Thinking about it now, actively inserting html into what i'm "saying" is absolutely foreign to my thought processes. I'm having a discussion with a group of people, not marking up a web page. [*1]
I suppose that means that i am lazy or resistent to evolving to a web-based forum user. So, it might indeed stem from "convenience".
as for "[/whatever]" mode. From my perspective, i see two distinct evolutions.
1- IRC. IRC used "/" as a preceder to system and user commands. for instance "/me waves to all" denotes an _Action_ as opposed to a verbilization ("Hi all, if i could i'd wave to you!". I saw, and performed as well, a lot of that on Usenet. A mix, perhaps, of "cute", "novel", and "efficiency". Again, this was used to generate a sense of physical action in a purely text based portayal of a verbal conversation.
2- HTML. Again, on Usenet, the one faux-markup i'd use and that i saw most in my little corner of heaven..., was the "[voice type= ]" "tag". Again, inserting more, um, "flavor" into a text-based portrayal of verbal communication.
[voice type=Homer] D'oh! [/voice] Seems to "do" more than: "D'oh! (you know, like homer would say)."
Keeping in mind the era (_before_ people where actually communicating through html oriented interfaces (a la this forum) ), HTML knowledge was still _somewhat_ arcane (albeit decreasingly so) and usenet's "core" user base was distinctively more Geek oriented than not.
Wombat,
Thank Choopernickel. He "magicked" Toofy into the clean-cut calcium deposit you see before you. (Incidentally, i've been asked before why i use the tooth as an avatar before. Simply, whenever i say something really stupid, or possibly mean sounding, or whatnot imagine my response to your query as "hey, i'm a big smiling tooth carrying a toothbrush!!").
As for dialects, i agree. I lived in many different areas growing up, and as such was subjected to the phenomen before i actually understood what was going on. As such, i'd think i'm a bit more lenient, and also my "dialect" is a definite amalgamation. As someone who will say "Ya'll don' know what it's aboot", i guess it makes sense to me to use faux html tags, irc'isms, etc in the "wrong" mediums.
Jldunston,
I don't like your tone. (ha. hah. hahah. answering service? answering machine? tone? get it? see, i'm a big giant tooth holding a toothbrush!)
Slink-
I don't do a ton of text messaging on my phone, but i do use it about once a day or so. as i'm awkwardly ten-keying in "you" over and over again, i ask myself "kevbob, why don't you just use "u"?" and the answer is, because by the time i think of it, i'm done. but, i've begum to use "u" more often. lazy? or efficient?
However, given a keyboard, i don't see any true efficiency in shortening "you", as the time gained versus the communications problems with the receiver do not equalize.
Yet, if i "started" as a text messager, i'm sure i would be much more habitual in my abbreviations.
Andalucia,
Those speeches from previous years _were_ aimed at the lowest common denominator: the LCD of those who could _READ_. Also, has it not been said that Shakespeare wrote his plays for the LCD?
I guess if you can knowingly refer to your pedantry as "Ridiculous", that counts for something. ; )
-
[*1] Ya, i alter my habits based on circumstance as well. For instance, i'm of a general "don't edit" mindset. mistakes are mistakes, if this was for money or my job, maybe, but i'm conversating not designing a bridge.
Yet, here i am editing just to fit in.
Anyways,,,
So i say inserting html is foreign to my brane, then i go on to explain that i used [voice type = ] faux-tags on usenet. so, obviously the idea of marking up in html isn't foreign. except that i said "verboten" too, and The German Language is devotely foreign to me.
YMMV, just add water.