Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[jough]

My keyword-rich subject is only semi-mocking celebrity photo sites.

Anyway, I figured the best way to critique celebrity photo sites is to make one myself:

All Celebrity Photos

(also http://free-celebrity-gallery.com works)

My question to you is: what hotties that you like to ogle am I missing?



Also: ladies, would you like to see a web site full of photos of hot looking celebrity men, or is this just a "guy thing"?[/url]

[V-Adore]

See, my first connotation with "male celebrity photo galleries" is "... in the pursuit of proving that Elijah Wood and Dom Monaghan are sleeping together and are giving 'shout-outs' to their fans, maintained by people who make me look like I have my life together," so.. not quite, no.

[Choop]

Dude, how did you get all these photos?

Your bio-blurbs are funny, yet somehow banal at the same time.

Good collection, though.

[jough]

Dude, how did you get all these photos?

Well, most of them come from a friend who collects scans.  Then I got some other HQ stuff from the AP news wire of celebs at events and stuff.

Plus, I have a little spider leech ***** that does my bidding.

Your bio-blurbs are funny, yet somehow banal at the same time.

Yeah, I started adding some explanation as to who the hell some of the women are, and then it looked stupid to have *some* blurbs and some without blurbs, so now they all have mundane blurbs that I'll sometimes make snarky.  My choice for style was to use movie, tv show, or album titles that the celeb is associated with in a sentence describing them in some way, if possible.

[AlohaDawg]

Dude, how did you get all these photos?

Well, most of them come from a friend who collects scans.  Then I got some other HQ stuff from the AP news wire of celebs at events and stuff.

Plus, I have a little spider leech ##### that does my bidding.

The spider leech thingy tends to gather duplicates but the more the merrier, I say, especially when there's boobs involved.

[jough]

Yes, sorting through duplicates is the bane of my existence.

It's not too bad if they're EXACTLY the same except for the file name, but I try to keep the higher-resolution version of a photo.  I have a tool: Jasc Media Center - that lets me sort by resolution and image size, so I can eyeball it and sort through them.  

But for a celeb where I can find 1200 photos, there are bound to be some duplicates.

So is there anyone really insanely popular that I'm missing so far?  I'm trying to add chicks that the kids will search for on google.

[Bozack]

Buffy and Tru Calling fans, unite and take over.

Wow, cross-thread continuity: JOUGH LOVES HIM SOME MOZ.

[jough]

Yeah, just wait until I upload some Rose McGowan photos and will quote something from "How Soon Is Now?"

It's true, though, I do love me some Moz, and nary a day goes by where I do not drop a Smiths line into casual conversation.

[Ben-San]

The Google context-sensitive advertising for the FREE CELEBRITY BABE GALLERIES NUDE PHOTOS is for K-8 lesson plans. Approved.

[andalucia]

That's an interesting experiment, jough.  I don't have much experience with that particular genre of website, but your design's coherent and pleasant, and I'm sure the site delivers what it promises.

Also: ladies, would you like to see a web site full of photos of hot looking celebrity men, or is this just a "guy thing"?[/url]

My celebrity-ogling tastes run towards the indie rock types, so a gallery of Brad Pitts or whoever it is "the kids search for on Google" would do very little for me.

[Bozack]

My celebrity-ogling tastes run towards the indie rock types, so a gallery of Brad Pitts or whoever it is "the kids search for on Google" would do very little for me.

...MALKMUS!?!? YOU STAR-FUCKER!

PS. Also, I noticed that your page is missing a certain Achewood board favorite, a Ms. N. Case. DO SEE THAT THIS IS RECTIFIED.

[side_show]

Congrat's: the site is blocked by the IT dept of the Manitoba Metis Federation - which is interesting, because, judging by the posts on this thread, I've visited sites of much, much worse content while "working." Then again, our IT dept has blocked all of MSN, rather than just blocking MSN messenger (which I think was the IT guy's intent). That's right folks, I can got to www.rotten.com but not jough's site. Eviscerated corpses? Sure! Celebrity T & A? Sure, but not on jough's site!

[jough]

My site has photos of Britney Spears dancing.

Trust me, it's much worse.

[andalucia]

...MALKMUS!?!? YOU STAR-FUCKER!

Malkmus can be replaced by Devendra Banhart on that list should someone more cred-y be required.

Congrat's: the site is blocked by the IT dept of the Manitoba Metis Federation - which is interesting, because, judging by the posts on this thread, I've visited sites of much, much worse content while "working." Then again, our IT dept has blocked all of MSN, rather than just blocking MSN messenger (which I think was the IT guy's intent). That's right folks, I can got to www.rotten.com but not jough's site. Eviscerated corpses? Sure! Celebrity T & A? Sure, but not on jough's site!

That is super unfortunate.  I was always utterly bewildered by the things that were blocked on my school computers.  I couldn't reference things I'd read in Dissemination  on my lunch break because I guess Derrida's Freudian puns were judged to be a little much for my impressionable adolescent mind.  I hope you can find some sneaky way around the blocking if you so desire.

[littlefallsmets]

The best thing about the "Users Online" feature of these boards is... checking how many unregistered guests are reading this thread.

This morning, it was like four! There were twenty-two people reading the Achewood Message board and four of them were looking for naked pictures of celebrities... why weren't they using a google search? Why weren't they going to any number of naked-specific websites?

Why were they looking here?

Is just that much of the internet devoted to naked?

A++++++, great seller, would read again.