Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[miles]

So you may as well get your groove on.  Not every two people are compatible sexually and it's better to find out before you're married that the only way your wife can get off is to have a Mexican juggling team fuck her in every hole she's got.

Oh, I was only kidding.  We've already taken each other for several test drives, and appear to be very compatible.  What I meant to say is that she is already talking about whether she'd like to have a boy or girl first.  Not that you get to choose...but apparently it's fun to talk about.

[CortJstr]

the only way your wife can get off is to have a Mexican juggling team fuck her in every hole she's got.

That's just sick! You disgusting bastard.
Unless the jugglers are wearing luchador masks. Then it's cool.

[Bozack]

...it's better to find out before you're married that the only way your wife can get off is to have a Mexican juggling team fuck her in every hole she's got.

My god.....the luchadors....they're made of stars!

[Beatrice]

Bozack, remember that horrible movie with the amateur wrestlers and the UHaul full of zombies you made me watch?  I know, i know, it's awesome on paper, but not when porn stars are playing superhero.  Anyways, luchadors, yeah.  I'd rather get with a zombie.

[jough]

Zombie porn?

Bozack, you've been holding out on us.

[Bozack]

Jesus, that movie sucked SO BAD. They weren't REAL luchadors, they were a bunch of asshole college students pretending to be luchadors. And there were all of these girls who were obviously supposed to be the sex interests, but they.....erghh. Were not.
I know it sounds like it would be hard to make a boring movie about luchadors, zombies, and scantily clad college students, but believe me, America is the home of innovation. We did it.

[Pedro Picasso]

Congratulations, Carlos!  Hurray!

Anyway, saving yourself for marriage was a population control concept.  That, and before we had SCIENCE people believed that you only had so many orgasms and then that was it - so you had to "save them" for marriage.

Now we know that is bullshit and while it is true that a woman only has so many eggs with which to create more humans they're going to be fertile for a couple days a month no matter what.

In defense of chastity, saving yourself for marriage is a helpful and useful concept even today!  Sexual intercourse is often treated lightly and has been for pretty much ever, but it is a big deal.  The emotional, psychological, and spiritual bonds it fosters are incredibly painful when broken.  That's why we have social constructs that aren't supposed to be broken at all.

As for casual sex, it may not lead to long term bonding, but over time it seems spiritually harmful.  Or psychologically if you prefer.  Kind of deadening.  

I've been unable to do personal research in this area, but these are my conclusions based on observation.  Lifelong marriage is the proper context for sex.  Outside of that, it just seems to mess things up.

JL and I were virgins on our wedding night, and it's really worked out for us.  Besides, if you're going to marry somebody and you're worried about what sex with them will be like, maybe you should reevaluate how much you know about the person and the level of attraction involved.

This message brought to you by the preachy prudes at Keep-It-In-Your-#####.org

[AlohaDawg]

Can't agree with that. But my hoss got out of the barn a long, long time ago. A lot of times.

Sex does not lead to psychological problems all by itself. I'd say more married people go nuts from marriage then sexually active people go nuts from fuckin'. The pathology comes first, then the acting out behaviors follow. Usually. It's about how you handle yourself and your situation.

If a person has a problem with a substance or behavior, they should be pointed toward help. If a person can handle a (legal or acceptable) substance or behavior, then they should be allowed to do it. It's that easy.

If you're religious beliefs call for chastity to marriage, that is something else. That's between people and God.

In terms of the 'secular' efforts toward abstention as a means of preventing pregnancy and STDs, studies seem to indicate that very often virginity contracts lead to experimentation in more risky forms of sex in order to avoid standard genito-penetrative sex. So what's worse?

[pmcd9]

In terms of the 'secular' efforts toward abstention as a means of preventing pregnancy and STDs, studies seem to indicate that very often virginity contracts lead to experimentation in more risky forms of sex in order to avoid standard genito-penetrative sex. So what's worse?

Our abstinance until marriage society has bred a generation of blowjob queens.  It's a great time to be a teenager.

~Paul

[CortJstr]

In terms of the 'secular' efforts toward abstention as a means of preventing pregnancy and STDs, studies seem to indicate that very often virginity contracts lead to experimentation in more risky forms of sex in order to avoid standard genito-penetrative sex. So what's worse?

I saw that story in the Post. Teens who sign the "virginity pacts" are more likely to do oral and anal. At work we busted a gut when we read that. Oral I can kind of see, but anal? That's just funny.

[AlohaDawg]

What's more funny is the first-timers who do the anal part first, and then the blowjob for a big finish.

MMMM-mmm!

[Pedro Picasso]

According to my cousin who is recently back from Afghanistan, Muslim men in that country are all about some anal for similar reasons.  All beards and back doors, those fighters.

[AugustWest]

What's more funny is the first-timers who do the anal part first, and then the blowjob for a big finish.

MMMM-mmm!

Tastes like....pistachios?

[Va]

My first husband was a virgin when we got together, and while it was really sweet getting to be someone's first, I was always worried by the fact that he had only ever had sex with me.  How could he not be curious about having sex with other people?  Hell, if he had cheated on me, I might have given him a pass on it.  Okay, no, there's no way I would give him a pass, but I would have understood.

[AlohaDawg]

I guess the real point is that everyone is different. I've met people who are really, truly monogamous and I've met people who have absolutely zero ability to be monogamous. And then people change over time, too....like when they have kids, for example.

More important, I think, than the individual's behavior is the relationship - you adjust yourself and/or the relationship if you both want to be in it. So horndog freaks wind up calming down, or strict puritan types become less so in accepting their partners foibles, or they both become swingers, or whatever...but either people are alone or together, and if together, than adjustments happen or they wind up alone again. What you value is a big factor that drives behavior.