It said no flaming, If all you have is an ad hominem attack off the thread topic, I think you fall outside the requested "intelligent" posts. Everyone else so far at least understood what I was saying.
Where did I flame or make an ad hominem attack? Quote me.
Yes, my post of yesterday was very angry. That anger was directed at the administration, on account of all those dead babies and old people and stuff. If you think I shouldn't be angry about that, I don't know what to tell you. I did call AD out on the whole "No blame game" talking point business, but I don't think that's a flame or an insult. I think you're arbitrarily declaring a topic off-limits because you can't effectively respond to the criticisms of the administration. It's not an insult to point that out--if you think it is, then you're much more sensitive than I thought possible. I ask you to explain to me why exactly we shouldn't hold those responsible accountable, other than so you aren't offended.
One person, ONE, tried to address my post on its merits. I appreciated RRC's point that there were other contributing factors, sure, but IMO the administration bears the brunt of the blame. Pointing that out is not "petty partisanship," it's wanting to confront reality and making sure this crap doesn't happen again.