Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you criticize them, you are a mile away from them and you have their shoes.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down

Author Topic: February 17th, 2006 - We's chuffed, we is!  (Read 11863 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

robot_god

  • roast beef (the middle cat)
  • Tiny cans of Dr Pepper: 74
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 1195
  • Oh my gosh, dude.
    • View Profile
    • ALP Myspace Site
Re: February 17th, 2006 - We's chuffed, we is!
« Reply #45 on: February 18, 2006, 07:50:50 pm »

What's up with bands needing to have a screaming guy or moaning girl (Linkin Park, Evanescence) anyhow? I was starting to get uppity too and I'm, like, twice as old as half this board (but not nearly in Rheumatron territory yet)

Apparently, it's great marketing for the 11 - 16 years of age crowd.  Someone's gotta get those kids a bong and a chemistry book.  Think of the possibilities.
Logged
ACHIEVE

robot_roll_call

  • Lie Bot
  • Tiny cans of Dr Pepper: 3
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 331
  • That's one o!
    • View Profile
Re: February 17th, 2006 - We's chuffed, we is!
« Reply #46 on: February 18, 2006, 11:06:19 pm »

If writing a hilarious blog is enough to merit qualification for the GOF, then is Onstad eligible?  I mean, if the dude would deign to write himself into this arc, he is like ten times the size of the average competitor.  Might he even *gasp*  cut a fine challenge for Rodney L., based on mass alone? Such conjecture reminds me of the old hypothetical one-on-one football games between Ditka and God.

Sure he's 10 times bigger, but would YOU want to be in the middle of 3000 pissed off cats? It'd be like David and Goliath, only this time David wins!
Logged
Did you know that Achewood is literary.

nuero

  • Chucklebot
  • Tiny cans of Dr Pepper: 4
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 105
    • View Profile
Re: February 17th, 2006 - We's chuffed, we is!
« Reply #47 on: February 18, 2006, 11:48:39 pm »

More new (old) shirt designs. I guess. (Nowhere more relevant to put this information.)
Logged

Doc

  • Growing Cucumbers of Impressive Dimensions
  • Writer's Workshoppers
  • Philippe is standing on it.
  • *
  • Tiny cans of Dr Pepper: 1408
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5017
  • an emergency backup pug
    • View Profile
Re: February 17th, 2006 - We's chuffed, we is!
« Reply #48 on: February 19, 2006, 11:26:26 am »

You guys obviously haven't read 'Gasps and giggles' that's a hardcore blog so it is.

Onstad winning the GOF would be great fun 'hey don't pick me up man, what the hell?'
Logged
Inev: 'A lot of things are ridiculous if you think about them long enough, you know?'

Tangle

  • Chucklebot
  • Tiny cans of Dr Pepper: 2
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 102
  • hurry boy, she's waiting there for you
    • View Profile
    • She was born on 2 June 2006.
Re: February 17th, 2006 - We's chuffed, we is!
« Reply #49 on: February 19, 2006, 01:46:00 pm »

You guys obviously haven't read 'Gasps and giggles' that's a hardcore blog so it is.
Man I cold did my best to find it but no dice.

Do I hear someone say" googling for the blog of an imaginary British cat is sad and pathetic"? No? Good.

doomglobe

  • Dr. Andretti
  • Tiny cans of Dr Pepper: 35
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 410
    • View Profile
    • doom globe
Re: February 17th, 2006 - We's chuffed, we is!
« Reply #50 on: February 20, 2006, 06:02:13 am »

Is reading the blog of an imaginary cat sad and pathetic? Because I do that all the time. Honk if you think that is pathetic.
Logged
[expletive deleted]
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up