I saw this when it came out, and indeed, it is horror done right. Bit 50's, bit 80's B movies, plus funny. And Gunn even manages to pull off why the romance aspect to the film works. I was really quite impressed, and is definitely something I want to see again some time soon.
Definitely add to the recommendation.
Oh, also interesting, adult characters, which is so unbelievably fuck*ng rare for modern horror movies.
Onstad can pimp that Eli Roth guy and his Cabin Fever movie for all he wants, but that guy shot himself in the foot when he made Hostel which was purely a gratuitous waste of time. Horror without a point (as far as I'm concerned, I guess I must concede) is not worth the film it's printed on, I'm sorry. Just cause he came up with a plot does not mean it did anything but what it said on the box. By contrast, Slither, while maybe not scary in the same way, has so much more going for it... I've sat down with a number of people who are into film and had intelligent discussions about the construction of a movie based on having watched Slither. It works. Even if you don't like it, it would be difficult to argue that it is not a very well made film. Everything has a purpose, even the stuff I thought he was going to forget about.
I say this, as I actually went and saw Lady in the Water the other night, and oh my word. What I just said about films working... Not the case there. It was a self-aggrandising, pretentious, wandering, futile, laughable piece of crap. Or so we, and the movie critic I respect thought. (And just watch for what he does to the movie critic who otherwise plays no role in the whole film... For fucks sake man, really!)
I guess I'm done... I ought not go on much more about Shayamalamalamalamalamalan.
*grin*