maybe they don't have a "problem" with it-- but they do have it. I mean, a piece of highly sensitive skin was cut off of them. Thems the facts.
Yeah, but... and I apologize in advance if this turns into a giant-ass rant... it bugs me a lot when circumcision is directly compared to female genital mutilation, because the two are not even in the same
galaxy. FGM involves mutilation so severe that any kind of pleasurable sex, or even non-painful sex, is impossible, on top of having any number of urogenital-health complications and drastically increasing the danger associated with childbirth.
FGM kills people. I can understand the idea that people opposed to FGM might also logically be opposed to circumcision, but there is absolutely no comparison in terms of magnitude -- unless you are seriously prepared to argue that taking somewhat longer to orgasm is comparable with sex being agonizing and childbirth being deadly.
Furthermore, it is extremely irritating that, for a lot of guys, female genital mutilation is just another excuse to bitch about their own junk. Please don't be that guy.