Oh, we all have respect for the dude with the naked chick. Don't get me wrong.
I was just over-analyzing that photo. The only way that photo makes sense to me is if the dude in the photo paid the girl to have her snap shot.
And of course someone else must be there *taking* the photo.
That's what's always ruined porn for me: the knowledge that there's a whole crew of people behind the camera, all adjusting lighting, all holding up cue cards that say "I want to suck your cock" on them, all whispering suggestions ("Put your tongue deeper into her assole"), all being really bored with the whole thing because they watch people bumping and grinding and getting sticky 40 hours a week, all jaded and strung out on heroin, all driving real fast around the California coastline and swerving off the edge and down to the rocks below, all tumbling and getting mangled up, all you can't tell where the pieces of car or person begin, all hitting the bottom with a thud, all five seconds of too much silence, all suddenly bursting into flames, all huge fireball broiling up the cliffside, all "LOCAL PORN ACTRESS DIES IN A HUGE FIREBALL EXPLOSION. THIS IS TERRIBLE", all replacing her on set with five girls who look just like her and give more energetic blowjobs, all no one missing her, all what's left of her being gathered into a shoebox and taken out on a little boat, all dumped overboard by her childhood sweetheart who secretly always loved her...
No good can come from that photo, Paul. That's just a whole terrible future in photographic form.