Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

TOUAMB: Debating the decline and fall of Chris Onstad since 2003.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Sungjae

Pages: [1]
1
Wild Card / Re: Organizization Codependency
« on: November 03, 2009, 05:55:57 pm »
jay-ell,

Have you and/or your spouse been evaluated by a shrink for anxiety, ADHD, AS or the like?  What your above two posts describe seems like it could be either anxiety and/or a failure to see the forest for the trees phenomenon.  But maybe I just recognize that because it's what I'm personally familiar with from my own experience.  Myself, I am extremely capable of structured thought, but not of strategic thought.  I do better in a structured environment, such as the workplace, where the overall strategy of what we are doing has been determined by someone else.  I can solve the puzzles of how to get a particular task done with given resources.  Where I suck is being able to integrate disparate concepts together into a coherent strategy... I can work with apples, and I can work with oranges, but I can't work with both at the same time.  The job I failed the hardest at was delivery driver for a busy mom 'n pop operation.  Nothing was computerized, but it didn't have to be.  It was in a small town that was easy to navigate... But it required balancing numerous disparate and conflicting objectives... keeping delivery times short, but accepting as many deliveries as possible.  No fixed set of rules, no decision making flow chart, could respond to every possible combination of demands and objectives that would arise every day.  I could be successful on a given day, but I could never tell you why.  I don't learn strategy, I learn detail.  I wake up each morning with amnesia, having forgotten any sort of strategic ideas I may have formulated the night before.  Every day is a totally new day of reinventing the 'organizational' wheel all over again.

Making lists of items to do, and organizing these lists into categories, it tends to work for me only for a short short period of time, until such time as the number of items on the lists grows, and I become overwhelmed with it all.  A list of things to do or even a list of categories of things to do is not the same thing as a strategy.  Making lists works for me initially when only a few things are on the list because it forces me into a defacto strategy of focusing on only those things which I happen to remember initially and put on the list.  But it fails in the end because over time I tend to remember more and more things that I want to do or that need to be done, so it all melts down, I set the list aside and loose it in all the clutter, and eventually the cycle repeats it's self where I will start a new list after a few weeks or months of dysfunction and depression.

I have recently found a mechanism that seems to work better for me - I consciously force myself to not think on a low level... low level thought being thought about individual specific items.  my mind loves to go for low-level items.  It's very good at exhaustive low-level thought... I'm almost like some sort of rain-man in how I can deconstruct things on a low level.. I can take apart anything mechanical and figure it out better than most people can... I can fix just about anything... instead, I force myself to think about things that are higher-level... that are strategic in nature... with the idea being that the low level tasks of the day, what to do next and in what order, this low-level arrangement of tasks can spontaneously arise from the direction provided by having a high-level strategy, a higher-level purpose in life.  

Of course, we all have higher-level purpose in our lives... we have hopes and dreams, we have goals... but how much time do we actually spend thinking about things from a higher-level perspective, and how much time do we spend worrying about things that are lower-level...  anxieties such as changing the oil in the car before the engine blows up, getting bills paid on time, and so on...  The more time you spend thinking about something, the more your brain develops capability for thinking about it, and the better your brain gets at it... if overall you neglect to spend time visualizing the higher-level perspective, the bigger picture, then your capability to do so will become weaker over time, and pretty soon the big picture of your life, your higher-level hopes and dreams, become abstract notions wholly disconnected from your daily life.

So that's what I've been finding recently seems to be working for me, is to force my activities to flow from the higher level concepts, from the bigger picture of my life, to force myself to develop that bigger picture, and to hopefully over time gain a more functional understanding of how to make that happen as I gain more experience doing that... to force myself to stop doing things because they are causing me anxiety, and instead to do things because they stem from some positive purpose in my life.  I've spent most of my life doing things in response to some anxiety, either immediate or projected, and I've found that there's no end to the amount of anxiety I can generate for myself.  I've found that after years and years of trying, a coherent high-level strategy has yet to emerge from my low-level focus on lists of items, and so my life hasn't really gone anywhere I've intended or wanted it to.  I've had fun along the way, I've had lots of crazy and wacky adventures, but I want to shape my life into something different, and I want to do so more deliberately.

2
Achewood / Re: Beefy - Nov 02 2009
« on: November 03, 2009, 05:56:26 am »
I dont think that mob mentality is always a bad thing. As a species it has behooved us to maintain a certain level of conformity, otherwise the population would disperse or react differently to threats and not remain cohesive enough to survive. And, as contrarians got weeded out of the population, the tendency toward conformity increased.

evolution in complex systems is not this simple.  For example the concept of increasing returns dictates that often getting your foot in the door first in a complex environment is more important than being best.  Take keyboards - One of the most successful keyboard layouts to have evolved is QWERT, and it was designed to be as slow and inefficient as possible to type on because the keys on early typewriters would jam up if people typed too fast.  

I don't think that your argument for how mob mentality could have been an evolutionarily advantageous trait is valid, but, I don't have any argument to present that it isn't or that the opposite is true.  Maybe mob mentality is something which is encoded in the genome, hardcoded in the hardware of the brain, or maybe it evolved in human culture, aka the wetware.  Or maybe both.  Certainly, culture can trump biological traits, in the sense that we may have evolved such that fast food and zero exercise will kill us, yet our culture pushes us towards this lifestyle.  Maybe we are genetically averse to mob mentality, but it's our culture that pushes us towards it.  All possibilities I think.

obviously mob mentality will continue to bestow evolutionary advantages to many individuals in many cultures for decades if not centuries to come - places like North Korea for example...  Consider also that of all 1st world countries, I think it can be said that conformism is disproportionately high in the U.S.  It's too simple I think to say that wealth promotes individualism, because hey, the U.S. has hella poverty for bein' a 1st world country.  Perhaps even conformism and individualism, when carried to the point of psychosis, are two sides of the same psychosis. 

There is a myth of individualism in the U.S., and the U.S. subscribes to this myth.  While the U.S. does have a tradition of individualism, and while this tradition did originate in rebelling against conformism imposed by Great Britain, for the following two centuries this tradition of individualism has prospered as a contrast and in response to overwhelming forces of conformism which are domestic in nature and which at present rival, at the very least, in effect and in scope, if not in method, the forces of conformism of Great Britain some two centuries previously.

In the complex environment of culture, advanced such as it has these past few years, I'd say that maybe the only absolute that might be true might be the idea that any absolute is going to be worse than none.  And I think that this includes mob mentality.  

If I were president, I'd be pushing that fuckin' red button in the briefcase.  screw you guys, we're gonna TILT this bitch.  We're starting from scratch.

3
Achewood / Re: Beefy - Nov 02 2009
« on: November 02, 2009, 08:58:01 pm »
The standards are encapsulated well by social norms and the niceties of human interaction, aka "manners."

Just because you don't understand the paradigm doesn't mean there isn't one.


"paradigm" is a pretty fancy word for what amounts to mob mentality

4
Achewood / Re: Beefy - Nov 02 2009
« on: November 02, 2009, 05:00:44 pm »
It looks like this happens automatically if you are "jeered" enough?

Interesting. Automated community standards.


it would be nice if it was more of a scheme of standards and less of a mine field of capricious whims...

5
Achewood / Re: Beefy - Nov 02 2009
« on: November 02, 2009, 04:00:38 pm »
It has pissed me off to an extent that would probably be hard for others to understand.

I'm bipolar, until I got medicated I would quite easily fly into obsessive rages over things big and small, so perhaps I understand?

As far as Onstad/Achewood's interaction with the fans, it's too bad that this interaction is trapped inside the limitations of assetbar.  Both Onstad and the fans deserve better.

6
People & Places / DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S KINGDOM OF ECSTACY AND WRATH
« on: November 02, 2009, 12:15:04 pm »
DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S KINGDOM OF ECSTACY AND WRATH is located on the northern part of the Korean peninsula. The country borders China and Russia to the north and is surrounded by the Sea of Japan to the east and the Yellow Sea to the west. The official name in Korean is Choson Minjujuui Inmin Konghwaguk. The capital of the DPRK is Pyongyang. The DPRK is a country of soaring and beautiful mountains with remarkeable landmarks throughout the country.

For more information about the DPRK, please visit the country's official website here. http://www.korea-dpr.com/DPRK.htm

7
Achewood / Original Maakies strips are available once again, at $450 each,
« on: November 02, 2009, 10:34:49 am »
Original Maakies strips are available once again, at $450 each, which includes shipping.

this was pretty funny

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zERQmic3JJ8

this too

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXTbXOuMB4o

this not so much

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBRsn5STPag


Pages: [1]