Ray may know what an 'net scammer is... but does he yet know that Wikipedia is basically bullshit?
Editing Wikipedia is basically my hobby, and let me say....some people have a stick up their nether region and would not let a large article, with a picture, be complete bullshit. Including me. There is no way that a page "ten scrolls deep" would be complete bullshit or vanity - anything that does not have at least one major third-party source to confirm notability is destined for deletion. People are PASSIONATE about that stuff.
Wikipedia can have bullshit in the details (bullshit-potential is right), but vanity articles or articles consisting only of lies are rare. It's a starting point; something to check shit out on, to see if someone actually exists/is notable. Perfect for confirming the existence of someone whose fame may be great, but not in your realm of familiarity.
I have a suspicion that Onstad is a Wikipedia nerd as well; the Ray's urine article was pretty accurate in terms of the [[Wikipedia]] shortcuts used (though it was simplified), the diction is always right-on, the infobox in this one looks pretty close, and he links to Achewood's Wikipedia article on the front page. This article, I bet, is for real for real.