Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Did you know...
that Wombat has figured out how to edit the News Box!

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5   Go Down

Author Topic: Linguistics Question  (Read 8700 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

dejavroom

  • Writer's Workshoppers
  • -=Ray=-
  • *
  • Tiny cans of Dr Pepper: 165
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 1362
  • confused and angry
    • View Profile
Re: Linguistics Question
« Reply #15 on: August 27, 2007, 06:06:42 pm »

***
PANLINGUISTICS FUN KORNER

Ugly word, eh. Imagine calling someone that. In Portuguese you can! It means basically what today's strip says about Lyle: He is a card-carrying, registered escroto.
Logged
The absurdity is veiled by the poetic charm with which the poet invests it.

jaydub

  • VIP
  • Philippe is standing on it.
  • *
  • Tiny cans of Dr Pepper: 1493
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5056
  • Arrant pedantry
    • View Profile
Re: Linguistics Question
« Reply #16 on: August 27, 2007, 09:26:23 pm »

Clitorises?  Even better.  (Clitori?  Spellcheck says no.) 
1=clitoris. 2=clitorides. 3=hottt! 
Logged
If you desire peace, work for justice.

Nabubrush

  • Nightlife Mingus
  • VIP
  • Philippe is standing on it
  • *
  • Tiny cans of Dr Pepper: 448
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 8782
  • The cat wonders if the camera is a foodstuff.
    • View Profile
    • Intonarumoron
Re: Linguistics Question
« Reply #17 on: August 27, 2007, 09:31:56 pm »

Beware the clitorides of March.

Wait, no, welcome the clitorides of March.
Logged
Never feel that you're out of the loop, because the loop is you. - Platon

Nabubrush

  • Nightlife Mingus
  • VIP
  • Philippe is standing on it
  • *
  • Tiny cans of Dr Pepper: 448
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 8782
  • The cat wonders if the camera is a foodstuff.
    • View Profile
    • Intonarumoron
Re: Linguistics Question
« Reply #18 on: August 30, 2007, 01:51:07 am »

I know, double-posting. Sorry, indulge me.

I got a linguistics question, too. There's going to be some background info in here that may or may not be pertinent, but I thought I'd throw it in. So, I'm in my morning call to town, trying to figure out what we did to earn yesterday's piece of our $200 million budget. There happens to be an African-American gentleman at this teleconference (at our end). He's sitting next to the guy who is filling in for the big boss. Anyway, the big boss guy (42 year old white fellow, went to school at Notre Dame) is discussing a job that has been placed on the back burner, or been delayed, or set aside, or whatever you'd call it. He, on the other hand, says that it "has gone to the back of the bus".

The first thing that goes through my mind is Rosa Parks. Obviously, any bus-related expression is fairly new. I suspect that the expression "back of the bus" originated with African-American people being asked to move back so white people could sit in the front of the bus. I don't think the expression was ever used in any other way until after Rosa Parks, and I daresay that it only rose to prominence through her. In other words, if someone uses this expression in a deliberately derogatory or offensive manner, it'll refer to Rosa Parks - and even if a person doesn't know that it's referring to her, that's where it came from.

So, I have to assume that he doesn't make that connection - i.e., when he thinks "back of the bus", he just connects it to other people who have said it, and never thinks of Rosa Parks at all. So I wonder, for all you imaginary folks out in intertubes land, if you think this is an offensive expression. I also wonder what you think about the way the language is changing in respect to expressions like this - because unless people are diligent about teaching their children about civil rights struggles, there will just naturally be fewer and fewer people who understand the origin of this particular expression. I just found it sort of interesting (and not prescriptivist vs. descriptivist, which is nice).

Back to your regularly scheduled programming, if this doesn't interest anyone.
Logged
Never feel that you're out of the loop, because the loop is you. - Platon

Ben-San

  • -=Ray=-
  • Tiny cans of Dr Pepper: 164
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1259
  • Two-Fisted Detective
    • View Profile
Re: Linguistics Question
« Reply #19 on: August 30, 2007, 02:14:43 am »

Actually, it makes me think of school trips, when people who were misbehaving would traditionally be sent to sit in the back of the bus, several rows away from everyone else.
Logged

CortJstr

  • Mod Squad
  • Philippe is standing on it
  • Tiny cans of Dr Pepper: 338
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 9820
  • Which gives us AN EXCUSE TO DRINK!
    • View Profile
Re: Linguistics Question
« Reply #20 on: August 30, 2007, 02:17:19 am »

Actually, it makes me think of school trips, when people who were misbehaving would traditionally be sent to sit in the back of the bus, several rows away from everyone else.

You went to a weird school. The back of the bus is the cool place to sit. Kids only sat at the front due to punishment (or nerdiness).
Logged

Nabubrush

  • Nightlife Mingus
  • VIP
  • Philippe is standing on it
  • *
  • Tiny cans of Dr Pepper: 448
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 8782
  • The cat wonders if the camera is a foodstuff.
    • View Profile
    • Intonarumoron
Re: Linguistics Question
« Reply #21 on: August 30, 2007, 02:24:29 am »

Actually, it makes me think of school trips, when people who were misbehaving would traditionally be sent to sit in the back of the bus, several rows away from everyone else.

Sure, Ben, but given the incident I was referring to happened in 1955, you'd have to be 60 years old to have the experience before what I was characterizing as the origin of the expression. Specifically, in the instance I was discussing, it wasn't like the guy was saying that the project was being punished. He was saying it was less valuable to the group to complete it.

My experience was much as CJ's - if you misbehaved you had to sit in the front so they could keep an eye on you.
Logged
Never feel that you're out of the loop, because the loop is you. - Platon

Nabubrush

  • Nightlife Mingus
  • VIP
  • Philippe is standing on it
  • *
  • Tiny cans of Dr Pepper: 448
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 8782
  • The cat wonders if the camera is a foodstuff.
    • View Profile
    • Intonarumoron
Re: Linguistics Question
« Reply #22 on: August 30, 2007, 02:27:26 am »

Miscellaneous explanatory background on the incident in question:

Quote from: wikipedia
In Montgomery, the first four rows of bus seats were reserved for white people. Buses had "colored" sections for black people—who made up more than 75 % of the bus system's riders—generally in the rear of the bus. These sections were not fixed in size but were determined by the placement of a movable sign. Black people also could sit in the middle rows, until the white section was full. Then they had to move to seats in the rear, stand, or, if there was no room, leave the bus. Black people were not allowed to sit across the aisle from white people. The driver also could move the "colored" section sign, or remove it altogether. If white people were already sitting in the front, black people could board to pay the fare, but then had to disembark and reenter through the rear door. There were times when the bus departed before the black customers who had paid made it to the back entrance.

For years, the black community had complained that the situation was unfair, and Parks was no exception: "My resisting being mistreated on the bus did not begin with that particular arrest…I did a lot of walking in Montgomery." Parks had her first run-in on the public bus on a rainy day in 1943, when the bus driver, James Blake, demanded that she get off the bus and reenter through the back door. As she began to exit by the front door, she dropped her purse. Parks sat down for a moment in a seat for white passengers to pick up her purse. The bus driver was enraged and barely let her step off the bus before speeding off. Rosa walked more than five miles home in the rain.
Logged
Never feel that you're out of the loop, because the loop is you. - Platon

wombat

  • English-Speaking Pizza
  • Moderator
  • Dude since Knucklehead times
  • *
  • Tiny cans of Dr Pepper: 644
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12493
  • Yeah man, these are pugs, not some fuck*ng lolcat.
    • View Profile
Re: Linguistics Question
« Reply #23 on: August 30, 2007, 02:34:01 am »


when he thinks "back of the bus", he just connects it to other people who have said it,

But can he have ever heard anyone else use this phrase the way he uses it? I certainly never have and I find it very surprising. My first impression is that this is some kind of weird individual confusion rather than a case of language change.

Logged
What is this, the fuckin' Algonquin Round Table or some shit?  - Nabu

If you're going to change your life then you have to change it every day, not just the days the world isn't taking a shit on you. -Doc

jaydub

  • VIP
  • Philippe is standing on it.
  • *
  • Tiny cans of Dr Pepper: 1493
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5056
  • Arrant pedantry
    • View Profile
Re: Linguistics Question
« Reply #24 on: August 30, 2007, 03:07:27 am »

But can he have ever heard anyone else use this phrase the way he uses it? I certainly never have and I find it very surprising. My first impression is that this is some kind of weird individual confusion rather than a case of language change.
I think he might have gotten confused with the "back burner" allegory.
Logged
If you desire peace, work for justice.

Nabubrush

  • Nightlife Mingus
  • VIP
  • Philippe is standing on it
  • *
  • Tiny cans of Dr Pepper: 448
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 8782
  • The cat wonders if the camera is a foodstuff.
    • View Profile
    • Intonarumoron
Re: Linguistics Question
« Reply #25 on: August 30, 2007, 03:19:12 am »

But can he have ever heard anyone else use this phrase the way he uses it? I certainly never have and I find it very surprising. My first impression is that this is some kind of weird individual confusion rather than a case of language change.



I guess I was thinking he had just heard it a few times, and didn't really identify it with meaning anything specifically, and so just figured it meant something farther away from where he was. Something that had been removed, something that was not important.
Logged
Never feel that you're out of the loop, because the loop is you. - Platon

linnea

  • VIP
  • Ocular Shenanigans
  • *
  • Tiny cans of Dr Pepper: 168
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 3332
    • View Profile
Re: Linguistics Question
« Reply #26 on: August 30, 2007, 03:45:44 am »

I guess I was thinking he had just heard it a few times, and didn't really identify it with meaning anything specifically, and so just figured it meant something farther away from where he was. Something that had been removed, something that was not important.

Did the gentleman on the conference call say anything? Did anyone call him on it? Man, I wonder what he was thinking.

Then again...in this day and age, a lot of times people just let shit go either from incredulousness or politeness. One of my best friends is devoutly Jewish. His rebbe stopped by his office at lunch. Craig had to get something from a neighboring office, and a woman walked right in front of them and yelled at one of her officemates, "Dammit, did you kike my pencil again?"

She walked off, totally oblivious to the fact that the two dudes wearing funny little hats were Jewish and that she had said something horribly offensive. Craig and the rebbe were too shocked to say anything. The other people in the office, though...they were totally horrified. Everybody stared at her in shock.

I don't know if the "back of the bus" comment is in the same league as far as offensiveness, but...Some people are just retarded.
Logged

smick

  • -=Ray=-
  • Tiny cans of Dr Pepper: 1351
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 1437
  • MasturBot 342: ONLINE
    • View Profile
Re: Linguistics Question
« Reply #27 on: August 30, 2007, 04:15:34 am »

She walked off, totally oblivious to the fact that the two dudes wearing funny little hats were Jewish and that she had said something horribly offensive. Craig and the rebbe were too shocked to say anything. The other people in the office, though...they were totally horrified. Everybody stared at her in shock.

My ladyfriend has a pretty obviously Jewish last name.   When she purchased her last car, the mechanic told her that the "brakes are at 35% so you can probably Jew them down on that."

I don't know if he was being unthinkingly racist, or if he was telling her to use her secret birthright powers.
Logged

Lister

  • Teodor
  • Tiny cans of Dr Pepper: 101
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 892
  • 2, 4, 6, 8, time to transubstantiate!
    • View Profile
Re: Linguistics Question
« Reply #28 on: August 30, 2007, 05:28:52 am »

I lived in Alabama for 25 years, and do not recall ever hearing the phrase "move to the back of the bus" used in any context.  Maybe my memory is faulty.

At work "the bus" is the latest horrible crisis that is sweeping through our department, and we discuss who is driving, flagging down, directing, or being thrown under it, but no one has ever moved to the back of it.

I can not help you with this, Nabu.
Logged
Lister.  Not that one, the other one.

Doc

  • Growing Cucumbers of Impressive Dimensions
  • Writer's Workshoppers
  • Philippe is standing on it.
  • *
  • Tiny cans of Dr Pepper: 1408
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5017
  • an emergency backup pug
    • View Profile
Re: Linguistics Question
« Reply #29 on: August 30, 2007, 09:56:19 am »

My first thought with back of the bus is school related too, though logically I know it doesn't hold up.
Logged
Inev: 'A lot of things are ridiculous if you think about them long enough, you know?'
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5   Go Up