run on sentence ahead...
The human society which is developing unique and innovative technologies to solve problems is only a small percentage of human society. The vast majority of human society isn't innovating at all, rather it is just stagnating and trying to survive, and that minority of human society which is innovating really has, since the beginning of recorded history, yet to do anything substantial to improve the quality of life of the vast majority of human society, and indeed to the contrary, 'innovation' has not improved the quality of life for the majority of human society, rather it has lowered the quality of life for the majority of human society, to wit all those suffering in 2nd and 3rd world countries... these countries have adopted various economic innovations and technological innovations, and are far worse off for it than when people there were happily existing in pre-industrial society. Moreover, all of that high-quality-of-life in the '1st world' which you equate with technological innovation, sure to some extent it's a product of technological innovation, but keep in mind that a central ingredient of '1st world' quality of life is the exploitation of the 2nd and 3rd world for cheap labour and cheap raw materials. Show me some society where the majority of technological innovation positively impacting quality of life isn't married at the hip with extensive exploitation... You're seeing only one site of technological innovation, without seeing the full picture of the actual reality of the situation.
I don't care if you disagree with me, but merely stating so is boring. It might be interesting to hear why you disagree with me.*
*(it could not be interesting because you are wrong.)