To begin with, there was so much mention made of the fact that, in the AFC, winning teams might be left out of the playoffs whereas in the NFC a losing team might make it in.
Now in the games this weekend, in both the Steelers - Jets and Patriots - Colts games, I saw offenses that had difficulties getting started and special teams and defensive play that was lacking. Mostly the special teams, as there was some good D played in the NE-Indy game. That game is even more interesting, though. Here's this mighty record-setting quarterback. This is his year. They managed three points. D'oh!
But all in all, neither of those two games were taken over by a team. Meanwhile, both games in the NFC were laughers, so I guess it looks to me like both teams in the NFC championship game are firing on all cylinders. In the AFC game, it appears that the team that screws up less will win.
To me, this says that some teams in the AFC padded their records against suboptimal competition. Two I can think of would be the Chargers and the Broncos. The Jets backed in, and barely won the game they did. Indy is doomed in the post-season. Who else was there going to be? Buffalo? They gave up 90 points to the three good teams they played. Jacksonville? Can you name two players for them?
I guess all I'm thinking is that I wouldn't want to be either of the AFC teams, going up against the Eagles (especially if TO is back) or the Falcons (Michael Vick should not be allowed to play football). All I heard was how the Eagles were going to suffer since they hadn't played a meaningful game in 6 weeks or so. Yeah, they looked rusty. And I think every player on the Falcons roster rushed for at least 500 yards this year.
I think that, because there were a few .500 teams that made the playoffs, everybody figured "well, the NFC sucks". But the whole thing about the playoffs is, the teams that don't deserve to be there get knocked out. In the games I watched, the NFC teams just look more ready than the AFC teams.